The Big Ol' George who gave a Peak Holyfield a hard war in 1991 vs teh Tyson who won over Ruddock twice in 1991. Stats - Foreman [Holyfield-fight version] This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Height - 6′ 3½″ Reach - 82" Weight - 257lbs VS. Tyson [Ruddock-fights version] This content is protected This content is protected Height - 5' 10" Reach - 71" Weight - 217lbs My guess for what happens is Foreman bullies Tyson with teh v.powerful jab And straight-right like Douglas did in 1990. if Tyson gets close Foreman would push him back using his big sholders And uppercut him extreamly hard like he did to Prime Frazier in 1973. By round 6 Tyson would probs be gassed like he was against Holyfield in 1996 - so Foreman goes in for teh kill. Foreman KO's Tyson in round 7 Or earlier if Tyson is knocked-down from a uppercut cos Tyson never had teh heart to get up once he was gettin hurt And losing.
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKqpOYH7T2k[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCttLWZVjz0[/ame] [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyklmNAK2wo&feature=related[/ame]
I think it's really hard to call. Foreman is all wrong for Tyson (look Frazier) and stated many times that he wants to fight him when it was still actually possible. Would George eventually crumble? I really have very hard time to answer. 50:50 fight for me.
wot d **** is the point making a poll and then have biased ass tyson hate options. This is a fight between two ATG's and your wording of the poll suggests this would be a cakewalk. Foreman wins but its by no means an easy win. And if someone made a case for Tyson winning it wouldnt be the most absurd thing in the world Hater
how teh **** is it 50:50 or hard too call?? :nut atsch You even admitt to esb that Foreman is all wrong for Tyson cos he is like Frazier in style And size. Prime Frazier of 1967-1975 is a better, tougher, Braver, Better conditioned fighter than teh mythical hypejob Prime Tyson of 1986-1997. When did Old Foreman "crumble"??? Look at his brawl WARS with Holyfield, Stewart And Briggs - He is a Warrior who Never quits And fights Hard for teh full fight.
Neither. Im a fan of the sweet science. I dont do cheer leading. That said anyone who thinks the 90's version of Foreman beats Tyson needs their head tested.
Your exposing yourself as a true hater. You make a biased ass poll where two of your options are (tyson had **** stamina) and (foreman had a great chin). Then laugh at someone who calls it 50/50. And why the **** even make a thread and poll if you are so sure Tyson would have no chance whatsoever?!?!? Your premise is purely to hate on tyson. FACT is Foreman of 91 was not at his best. Tyson is an ALL TIME GREAT TALENT. like it or not, h2h tyson is a tough match for nearly every heavyweight in history. Not everyone will agree that hes a top 10 ATG, but most will agree that he is a great TALENT. What people criticize him for mostly is his weak era when ranking him in ATG status. And his bad losses. But h2h prime4prime he gives anyone hell
Tyson is a greater fighter than Frazier. Tyson in his prime was just a beast. He was an in-fighter that can step in a boxer's space in a split second and hurt his opponent with a single punch. Tyson's defense is no joke as well. His head movement and his upper body movement is second to none. Compared to Foreman's style Tyson is better. Anyway, I think 1991 George will get KO against that Tyson. George is just too slow for Tyson. He will step in and hit Foreman's body and when Foreman bends over Tyson will finish him off by hitting him on the head.
Tyson gets in under those telegraphed punches and detonates on formans cheeen. Ko by rd 6. Holly in his fight had foreman on the biggest ***** street he's ever been on. Tyson would of finished the job.
Wow I forgot how Evander was struggling against a washed up 42 year old Foreman. Over the years I think less and less highly of Evander.