Not sure if this has been done before,but after reading some post about Marciano getting criticized for fighting older men or men that were past there primes,this is a link i found a while ago on youtube created by 00RoosterLife00. Very interesting facts. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WR_AOZNWr_I[/ame]
There's some truth in this, but comparing age difference doesn't tell the whole story of course. Certainly the Tyson comparison, because Tyson was extremely young in his prime, so of course there's a huge age difference. If you're 32 and you fight a 43 year old man, it's a 11 year difference. If you're 21 and you fight a 33 year old man, its a 12 year difference. If current Vitali (39) fights a guy 11 years older he would be ridiculed, beating up a 50 year old grandpa :deal
TboneNYC you are reaching a bit don't you think ??? You can't just pick and choose a fighter you wanna put in your equation. Why don't you change it and put Fraizer, Foreman in it ??? Another thing, fighters don't age the same way. Some peak in their middle thirties, some are by then completley shot. And what Robney said :good
I think IMO there is alot of truth to this. Rocky realy wasn't young himself when he fought the men mentioned in the vid.Where as Ali,Tyson,Louis were all in the primes of there lives when they took on the men mentioned in the vid. However you look at it,the fighters Ali,Tyson and Louis fought that's mentioned in the vid were all on there way out just the same.And realy cant be compared to a Louis,Charles,Walcott and Moore. The Vitali thing is not possible unless big George Foreman comes back.lol
Hey,Rocky is one of my favorite fighters yes.My dad showed me vids of all the fighters from way back before my time when i was a kid,but i feel that Rocky is the last fighter to be labled as over rated or a fighter who only fought older men. If anything,it took decades later and for Marciano to be gone before he started getting his due.Ratings use to not even have the man in the top 50 greatest heavys of all times untill he died. Thats crazy to me. In my eyes,Rocky Marciano is the poster boy for what a true great heavyweight champ should be like.In every way.Inside and out of the ring.
Hahaha alright alright I may be a noob post wise but i was dwelling on this forum for a long time I think ESB kind of grew on me Anyway, people have different definitions of greatnes, for some it means overcoming adversity and for others beating the best. I love the way he fought (not boxed) and there is nobody who could change my perspective, even though his biggest wins were against over the hill fighters (and Ali's weren't).
Assuming the four fights chosen for each man are the right ones (debateable), I believe two major problems still exist with this argument. 1) Age gap and age are not equivalent concepts. A 10 year age gap from 20 to 30 is clearly much less significant than the 10 years between 30 and 40. Fighters deteriorate much faster after 30 and even more so when then have the kind of miles on the clock that Rocky's opponents did. The problem is Rocky's guys were old, not older. 2) As time goes on athletes' medical treatment and training regimes evolve along with many other aspects of their health and fitness. We know better with each new era how to preserve fighters and allow them to fight on longer. Rocky is still one of my top 10 ATG HWs but he's probably bottom of the pile for these reasons.
Ali, Tyson and Louis were in their early twenties for their 'four most important fights' and were fighting guys in their early thirties...Tyson was the youngest champion ever...Marciano was late twenties/early thirties for the comparisons...I think this guy did a pretty good job of disproving his own point...