Margarito VS Pacquiao= Fixed Fight, IMO!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Hitta_Squadup, Sep 16, 2010.

  1. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    2,918
    Likes Received:
    0
    good article...
     
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    42,502
    Likes Received:
    405
    Great read.
     
  3. Ukansodoff

    Ukansodoff Deontay plz stop ducking Joshua. Thank you. Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2010
    Messages:
    10,980
    Likes Received:
    6,713
    I cant see this fight being fixed as such but id expect Arum sees it as a fight that Pacman cant lose, he wouldnt risk him now with the Mayweather fight and all that money on the back of his mind.

    But then i think Arum could be understimating Margarito a little. Hes a tall guy with a good reach, i dont expect him to win but i cant see him lying down for Pacman. Pacman will have to earn his victory.
     
  4. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    3,507
    Likes Received:
    30
    One of the greatest article off all time, props.
     
  5. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    7,856
    Likes Received:
    0
    more of a "Conspiracy Theory" fan :think
     
  6. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    31,154
    Likes Received:
    2,111
    :lol:I keep hearing "great Article".......

    Dont you all mean great post in regards to the thread starter???
     
  7. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Messages:
    18,163
    Likes Received:
    2
    Enjoy!
     
  8. EL CABALLO

    EL CABALLO Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,497
    Likes Received:
    1
    No, it's the newest, stupidest trend here @ ESB (not that there's a lack of them). If I'm not wrong , I believe it started yesterday with a thread started by "Karceno."
     
  9. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    31,154
    Likes Received:
    2,111
    :huh

    :lol:
     
  10. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    0
    :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  11. darryl1914

    darryl1914 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2009
    Messages:
    8,243
    Likes Received:
    2
    Threads like this are just PLAIN HILARIOUS!!!! However, with that being said, I love to see them from time 2 time because of it's ability to EXPOSED "certain" posters. These idiots find it just plain stupid to think that the fight with Joshua Clottey was fixed...Yet have NO problems in believing a Future Hall of Famer in Shane Mosley was paid to "throw the Fight". It's amazing how they so easily dismiss some conspiracies....but find others ABSOLUTELY CREDIBLE!!!
    This content is protected
     
  12. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2008
    Messages:
    7,856
    Likes Received:
    0
    i was trying to find the thread where Karceno was exposed but to no avail. maybe it was deleted by the mods.
     
  13. jansby mac

    jansby mac Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2010
    Messages:
    2,474
    Likes Received:
    0
    :good
     
  14. esrotak

    esrotak newbie +1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    976
    Likes Received:
    0
    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:
    :nut:nut:nut:nut:nut:

    dude! which fight were you watching when Pac fought Hatton? You're basically saying that Hatton could take that punch? I'll remember your name...Your the most stupid observer I've ever known lmao!!
     
  15. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Messages:
    24,013
    Likes Received:
    16
    I'd just like to offer my thoughts on what the OP said . . .

    Good article