Frazier beats Wlad...

The reason why Wlad doesn't commit to his power is because he has a serious flaw with his chin.

You're like the tin man saying, "If only I had a heart..."

When Wlad commited more, he got knocked out. He obviously lacks confidence in his chin.

And while I agree that Wlad is a very hard hitting heavyweight, although I disagree with Steward on his footwork, Wlad doesn't have the TOOLS necessary to beat Frazier.

Power alone is not enough. You need a vessel to deliver that power.

In a perfect world where Wlad had everything, he would be the best fighter of all time, but he doesn't have everything, and that's what people need to realize. You can't just say, well "IF he had this....or IF he changed his style....or IF he did this..."

That's unrealistic.

 

This is all nonsense.

Wlad does throw his punches straighter than Foreman, and he does choose to box more rather than pursue his opponent or remain relatively stationary, but that doesn't mean he matches up the same way against Foreman's opponent than Foreman himself does.

He doesn't have the same style as Foreman.

Wlad simply lacks the arsenal and confidence in his chin to dispose of Frazier the way that Foreman did.

And honestly, I don't think Wlad fights like Lewis. Yes, it's true they are both technically proficient fighters, that have big right hands and solid jabs, but Lewis was far more confident and definitely commited to uppercuts and early far more often.

Not to mention the fact that he looked good when the threw them and he threw them at the right time, meaning they were accurate.

When Wlad throws uppercuts, he throws them like an amateur which is likely why he misses with almost every single one. It was even worse when he threw them against Ibriganov. It was terrible in fact.

Lewis is also more willing to fight if he has to and it's because while he has had issues with his chin in the past, he's far more confident in it and will press the fight if necessary.

And Klitschko was knocked around the ring in the first fight against relatively short Peter, and knocked out by Lamon Brewster who isn't short, but isn't exactly tall either.

I'm not sure exactly what your issue with Frazier's height is here considering those circumstances.

 

He doesn't have to because his opponents aren't very good, unless you're telling me that for some reason heavyweight boxing is the only division in history where all you need is 2 punches to dominate everybody in heavyweight boxing history.

Because Lennox didn't need the uppercuts that were vital to beating a faded Tyson.

So I can only assume Wlad wouldn't either. Because people here assume that Chagaev is like Tyson.

So obviously Wlad only needs a jab and that's all, even if they compare him to Foreman in the sense that he would beat Frazier predicated on his size and power, despite the fact that uppercuts were absolutely ESSENTIAL and beating Frazier.

Yet for some reason, nobody addresses this point.

You see, the first statement in your post describes your knowledge to a T.

You don't know **** about boxing.

 

Not that Frazier. I'm talking about the 5'11'' 1/2 Frazier that fought Ali 3 times.

You know, the guy that's the same height as Tyson.

 

So not only are you obsessing over me and what my height may or may not be, but your seem like you're also obsessed with defending Klitschko even if you have to go the gay route to do it.

If that's not the sign of a gay homosexual, I don't know what is.