If Hopkins was in the 80's he would have destroyed Hagler hearns and leonard

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lightsoutoli, Sep 20, 2010.


Page 4 of 8
  1. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Troll meet ESB posters.

    Enjoy
     
    crimson, Sep 20, 2010
    crimson, Sep 20, 2010
    #46
  2. lightsoutoli

    lightsoutoli Active Member banned

    590
    0
    Sep 19, 2010
    Hagler coming foward with that mano e mano style like he did with leonard hearns the beast mugabi and all the rest would be dooms day with Hopkins. Hopkins tall and hes a thinker he wouldve killed hagler. Fighter today think no mano e mano
     
    lightsoutoli, Sep 20, 2010
    lightsoutoli, Sep 20, 2010
    #47
  3. boxing wisdom

    boxing wisdom New Member Full Member

    82
    0
    Aug 14, 2010
    Hopkins was a great champion but he would have ran like a chiken if he ever encountered with Hagler. No way he could have traded bombs with Hagler or Hearns.
     
    boxing wisdom, Sep 20, 2010
    boxing wisdom, Sep 20, 2010
    #48
  4. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    Hagler could box very well when he wanted to. Saying Hopkins would have killed him is ignorant, seeing as Hagler was never badly hurt in his career.
     
    jpab19, Sep 20, 2010
    jpab19, Sep 20, 2010
    #49
  5. lightsoutoli

    lightsoutoli Active Member banned

    590
    0
    Sep 19, 2010
    The executioner would have totally executed Hagler. There's no way in hell Hagler could've out box B-hop and when it comes to dog fighting B-hops the best. In the later rounds with all the hugging and malling B-hop would have taken Hagler out. Besides Hagler couldn't even beat a man that had been out of boxing for five years. Man yall go some where with the non-sense i want a real pro boxing conversation
     
    lightsoutoli, Sep 20, 2010
    lightsoutoli, Sep 20, 2010
    #50
  6. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    32
    Jan 4, 2009
    :lol::lol::lol: Going by the above spasticated post it's more than evident the midwife threw the baby away & presented yer mum with the afterbirth:yep
     
    duranimal, Sep 20, 2010
    duranimal, Sep 20, 2010
    #51
  7. jpab19

    jpab19 Exploding Muffin Dad Full Member

    15,720
    5
    Jul 8, 2010
    You want a real boxing conversation? Why dont you **** off? In another thread you said Mayweather would ''beat the living dog **** out of Duran'' and now your saying Bernard Hopkins would knock out Marvin Hagler and you want a real boxing conversation? Just because you play Fight Night a lot doesnt make you a boxing expert dumbass.
     
    jpab19, Sep 20, 2010
    jpab19, Sep 20, 2010
    #52
  8. JediPimp007

    JediPimp007 Long suffering reader Full Member

    1,830
    552
    May 8, 2006
    Hagler too short? What are Hopkins and Hagler's reach? ;)
     
    JediPimp007, Sep 20, 2010
    JediPimp007, Sep 20, 2010
    #53
  9. 1HitterQuitter

    1HitterQuitter RUTHLESS BY LAW Full Member

    1,558
    0
    Feb 27, 2010
    Helllllll no.
     
    1HitterQuitter, Sep 20, 2010
    1HitterQuitter, Sep 20, 2010
    #54
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This lightsoutoli is obviously an alt and just trolling. 20 posts? Already made 4 threads? Add this idiot to the ignore...
     
    Lance_Uppercut, Sep 20, 2010
    Lance_Uppercut, Sep 20, 2010
    #55
  11. booradley

    booradley Mean People Kick Ass! Full Member

    39,848
    16
    Aug 29, 2006
    I thought maybe you had been feeding this guy some of those Alaskan bong hits:yep
     
    booradley, Sep 20, 2010
    booradley, Sep 20, 2010
    #56
  12. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    sorry, but i disagree.

    monzon is in my top ten fave fighters in history.i just love watching him.he's the greatest middle in history based on resume.no one can take that position from him.not hagler, not hopkins, no SSR, not anyone.

    but hopkins is a nightmare style for him.BIG TIME!!

    i see hopkins winning wide on UD.

    the sad thing is, monzon wouldn't do that well in the fight, apart from a few moments here and there.hopkins would make him look quite ordinary.

    that's coming from a very unbiased side.hopkins is a great fighter, and i have a lot of respect for him.but he just doesn't do it for me.and as i've already said, monzon is in my top ten fave fighters in history.no.2 to be exact.

    so i would have no reason to say hopkins beats one of my fave fighters in history.that's just the way i see it.no bias what so ever.:good
     
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    #57
  13. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    hagler beats hopkins.but hopkins stands a chance.

    hopkins stops hearns late.

    hopkins/leonard could go either way.
     
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    #58
  14. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    what???

    you call the leonard that beat hagler, prime?

    WTF!!
     
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    #59
  15. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    hopkins would easily beat hagler??

    man, you must smoke a lot of crack!!

    hopkins gives him a tough fight, but hagler wins on the cards by 2 or 3 points.
     
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    assasin, Sep 20, 2010
    #60
Page 4 of 8