Money Meets His Match!!! The New Ring Cover Story

There's a few of his fights around. It's not like he's Harry Greb.

 

Another angry rant....is that all you do? Check your ****in blood pressure man... "I refuse to give him huis due" - WTF are you talking about? Because I don't suck him off like you do? You're the kinda loser who always saysm "Floyd wins easily...", that's the kind of joke you are.

"Duran had trouble with guys with speed and defense" Like who dip****? You make these vague comments and don't back **** up. You're a ****in joke dude. Your breakdowns as as simple as "Floyd wins", even if you think you say alot. That's all you got. You're just an angry street rat joke!

 

Take Armstrong off that list along with the million years comment and :good

 

Floyd beats everyone on that list, developing a plan for each in turn. It's revisionist history and biased at best. Where's the 10 fighters who would whup Pac list?

 

WHy don't you go sell some crackrock to your baby momma ******. PLease continue to be a negative sterotype *****! :rofl

Or, why don't you actually ADDRESS the post to bladerunner on DLH's prime, instead of acting like a ****in crybaby. atsch

 

Besides the fact that this isn't what I meant when I said what I said, how much better do you honestly think DLH was than the future HOF'er in Tszyu? I don't think he was any better myself.

 

Ray Robinson. I agree.
Ray Leonard. I agree.
Thomas Hearns. I agree.
Aaron Pryor. I don't agree.
Henry Armstrong. I don't agree.
Roberto Duran. I don't agree.
Pernell Whitaker. I agree.
Oscar De La Hoya. I don't agree.
Sandy Saddler. I don't agree.
Alexis Arguello. I don't agree.

The Sugar Ray's both have better boxing skills. The gap is not as big as it is often made to be though. They both have the size advantage over Floyd Mayweather Jr. The advantages are more in height than in reach.
With both Robinson and Leonard I would favor them both 60/40 ofer Mayweather.

Thomas Hearns might not have the same skills as Mayweather, but he is a very good boxer in his own right. He also has a huge size advantage. On paper he is the best Head 2 Head at 147, and in my opinion is going to be the toughest match up hear.
I like Hearns 80/20 over Mayweather.

Pernell Whitaker has better skills than Mayweather. Maywether has the size advantage more so than Robinson or Leonard has on him. Both Whitaker's southpaw style and Mayweather's right hand leads are going to play off each other. At 135 I like Whitaker 60/40 at 140 I'd go at 50/50. At 147 I like Mayweather 60/40 maybe 55/45. At 154 I'd go at 50/50.

 

I disagree with Sadler and probably Arguello.
ODLH is a toss up, but I lean on ODLH if under 147 prime Oscar.

Everything else I agree.

 

Duran would have chased the **** out of the ring & as far as speed & defence:nut Just go watch Duran outspeed/outthink/outfight & dominate Sugar Ray Leonard in Montreal & Mayweathers a poor man's Leonard:deal

 

I think Hearns is the only one that beats him 10 times out of 10. Every other fight I would give Floyd at least a decent shot of winning.


They really should've listed Pacquiao though just for motivation.

 

The Ray's beat him 10 out of 10...

 

The ring musta flip flopped because in an earlier issue, at welter, it the only guys that would really beat Floyd were...

Hearns, KO/TKO

Robinson UD

Leonard UD

I'm not sure if anyone else made the list...

 

Oh please, most of you mofos never seen half of these cats fight, you just say they school everyone because they are old school legends, just because antiques go up over time doesnt do the same thing with fighters improvement.

Really when has floyd struggled to get a win, his dominance in tactics is almost uncomparable by somebody who hasnt got one punch power.

He beats

sandy saddler (most you mofos never seen him fight and he is too small for floyd minus decent skills.

aaron pryor (takes the schooling of his life floyd too big and makes him off balance while he attacks.)

arguello (stop it)

henry armstrong (never seen him fight no comment)

duran is tricky one but i belive he would especially the welterweight version of floyd. Benetiz beat duran so i floyd most certainly would.

srr tough fight for both men, they both never fought styles of each other but out of three floyd may take 1

hearns floyd beats him again hearns was master boxer but floyd would smother his shots where they werent as effective and eek out decsion. benitez outboxed hearns aswel he nt as good as floyd.

srl beats flyd could fight too hard for him.

whitaker wat a fight both would need the right edge in ring but imo floyd wins, oscar and tito beat him they cant box like floyd.

 

That just means both could have been written by different people. RING, isn't only one opinion. It's a collection of writers.

 

Homicide Hank would smash Floyd's face to a million pieces