Lennox Lewis would've whoop Ali like he stole something

Lewis' reach would be nullified by Muhammed's quickness,timing and elusiveness.Ali would jab Lewis' head off.But what's REALLY funny is that your using Botha-Lewis as a Lewis blueprint to beat Ali

 

The first Lewis-Holyfield fight was defo a robbery,but the second one was pretty damn close.AND Lewis couldn't stop a past it Holy that had already been stopped years before against Riddick Bowe.As I wrote before,Ali was waaaay past it for Norton and the FOTC was Ali's second fight after a 3 year layoff.That's one of the big reasons what he did after those 3 years is so ****ing amazing.I'm still looking for Lewis' 3 year layoff.Mercer is not only inferior to Ali,but not as good as Frazier either.AND Mercer and Evander don't have anywhere near the skill Muhammed had,but look at the hell they gave Lewis.

 

No.Holy didn't have more of a boxing IQ than Frazier or Norton.Frazier was known for being a very intelligent infighter that utilized his bob and weave style and timing to perfection against fighters that were almost always taller with longer reaches.Norton's weakness was that he couldn't fight off the back foot or go backwards.His come forward style was effective against a past it Ali without the footwork,but detrimental to his health against murderous punchers like Shavers and Foreman.Holy,on the other hand,engaged in brawls on more than one occasion when it was unnecessary as he always relied on his heart and chin when faced with adversity.Evander had the quickness to outbox many,but his warrior spirit appeared unneccesarily too frequently.

 

And every one of the fighters you mentioned were stopped by AliWhat the man from Denmark is obviously able to see is what the rest of the world sees outside of what the biased and brainwashed englishmen can't see(those that think Lewis was better than Ali).You are English,aren't you?What's really funny is that useless Rahman knocked Lewis the **** out.And not much better Oliver McCall beat his ass,too.So probably the greatest puncher ever in Foreman stands no chance.Wow,I didn't realize useless Rahman and so-so McCall were so coordinated and so much more than Foreman,right?Biased and brainwashed AmericansEven Lewis admits Ali was better.Damn that biased and brainwashed American Lewis.****,he was CANADIAN.****!No he wasn't.He was born in London and spent his youth there.Guess he's not a biased,brainwashed American.You're funny.Wrong,but funny.

 

hell yeah. bowe was a lot more advanced than lennox lewis in skills

 

If leon spinks beat ali what would lennox do. If Norton broke his jaw what would lennox do. And Holyfield would hace beat Frazier Ali and George Foreman don't talk **** about Holyfield he whoop mike tyson ass didn't he.

 

you sick sonofabitch
that was the biggest robbery of that era have you lost your mind?

 

Bringing up the Spinks fight?Hilarious!I guess the fact that Ali was beyond shot to **** doesn't mean anything,right?As far as Norton breaking past it Ali's jaw,that would only strengthen the argument for Ali.Norton hit past it Ali sooo hard he broke Muhammed's jaw and ALI FOUGHT ON.Lewis was KNOCKED THE **** OUT by Rahman and HAMMERED by cokehead Carl.Nowhere on earth,not here or in Bizarro world,does Muhammed Ali get ko'd by Rahman or McCall.Lewis got outjabbed by 6'1" 77"reach Mercer.Could you possibly imagine what 6'3" 80" reach rapier like Ali jab would do to Lewis if Mercer could?Holy would beat Frazier and Ali?Oh yeah,Evander did beat George.He DECISIONED the FORTY-FIVE YEAR OLD 250 pound one.Gotta hand it to you.Yours is easily the worst post on this whole thread.And by the way,just what is Mike Tyson's greatest victory?

 

This a 50-50 Superfight - if you disagree with Me, then you hugely-underate Lennox or Ali. :deal :deal

 

Because lennox punches harder than Foreman?

Is this a stupid thread?

Lennox is slow and his advantage over other heavyweights at his time was his size and how he punches while the other hand is holding the opponent.

If Rahman could ko him, imagine what Ali could do.

 

Why?I think my argument is filled with facts and actual events.Not imaginary musings.

 

****ing lol @ people even looking at Ali's fights after he was well and truly done. watch both fighters in their time and I think we can both agree that Ali would've whooped lewis' ass and then **** in his mouth to confirm it

 

That comment is about as intelligent as saying if a Ken Norton (who was practically a cruiserweight) could break Ali's jaw and outpoint him, then Ali is going to be picking his head out of Row Z when Lewis hits him.

We all know that's not true, but that's how you argue. It's ****ing mental.

 

Your post is so ****ing idiotic.Mercer's jab is not as fast and accurate as Ali's.And his reach is shorter than Ali's.If Mercer outjabbed Lewis,it's easy to see Ali outjabbing Lewis even easier.Pretty ****ing logical and easy to understand.Sorry if logic doesn't work for you.

 

Yes you're right.

And Lewis's right hand is harder than Nortons, he's a smarter fighter than Norton, much, much bigger, and generally much better.

So, if Norton breaks Ali's jaw and beats him, then gets royally ****ed over when losing on points - Lewis knocks Ali out of the ring right?

If Ali has all he can handle with Joe Frazier, who is a midget in modern heavyweight terms, Lewis kills him right?

If Henry Cooper can sit Ali on his arse, then Lewis destroys him right? Right?


Your analysis is this. Mercers jab gave Lewis trouble. Ali had a better jab and was better than Mercer, so he wins easy.

It's so ****ing simplistic its a joke.



I think Ali wins this, but not because of your troll like bull****.