Greb vs Louis. What type of chance does Greb have?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Jun 27, 2009.


  1. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    25
    Jun 4, 2009
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Dillon is under rated because there is no film on him.
     
  3. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005
    I think whether Greb was excellent or not in 1926 was debatable. He was fading fast, had a lot of mileage on the odometer and wasnt training as hard as he had in the past and was having a difficult time making weight. Most of the reporters mention that he was not the same fighter they were used to seeing, looking weaker, slower, and having less energy. A prime Greb does not have nearly the trouble with Flowers as he did in 1926. Even in 1924 when he was still past his peak but still had something left in the tank he showed a lot more than he did in 1926.

    Dillon's best MW fights werent all losses. George Chip, Frank Mantell, Jimmy Gardner, Leo Houck (who Dillon was the first to stop and one of only two to do so, and he did it by caving in Houcks ribs), Bob Moha, Paddy Lavin, Gus Christie, Willie Brennan, Buck Crouse were all excellent MWs when Dillon fought them. Furthermore, you cant just discount his other wins at higher weights simply because they were at higher weights. He was a legit MW who was fighting and beating much larger world class fighters. You wouldnt count that against Greb's MW resume why would you count against Dillons? It still tells us something about him.
     
  4. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    25
    Jun 4, 2009
     
  5. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005
    I know thats my point, Im saying prime Flowers vs 1919 Greb is a completely different story. That being said Greb was still capable of beating a lot of world class guys at 160 in 1926. He just wasnt the guy you should be using to base Flowers' claim to greatness on.
     
  6. SLAKKA

    SLAKKA Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    25
    Jun 4, 2009
     
  7. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    That's a factor. Also the fact that he fought in the post-Ketchel middleweight era, which was quite possibly the strongest stretch in middleweight history (or any division's history). Easy to get lost among all those excellent fighters.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,099
    48,313
    Mar 21, 2007

    Why not? His is possibly the greatest fighter who has ever lived and was the middleweight champion of the world. Were there such a thing as a p4p list at the time he would unquestionably have been #1.

    In 26 he beat Gans, Delaney, was in two incredibly close fights with Flowers, and was 7-0 outside of the fights with Flowers...


    I don't dispute that Greb was faded, and i'm not making any rash claims about his being in his prime, but they are fantastic W's to have in that column. I think a decent parallel is Walcott versus a fading Louis. Had Walcott beaten the past-prime version of Louis twice, can you imagine what it would have done for his ranking? Instead of appearing at 15-20 he would have been in the ten. And rightly so. Beating one of THE defining fighters of your division - of any division - when he is the champion brings rewards. Why should it bring anything else?
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,099
    48,313
    Mar 21, 2007
    I agree, and I do say that his overall resume is impressive in an earlier post.

    Nor do I. But i'm most interested in deciphering his MW form when trying to rate him as a MW.
     
  10. Jersey Joe

    Jersey Joe Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,820
    7
    Mar 8, 2005
    Very low. A middleweight against arguably the best heavyweight ever, and one with great combination punching and finishing ability. Greb might win some rounds but there's no way he can keep Louis off him for the distance. If he's hard to hit Louis can just go for the body, the arms, anything, with 200lbs and his power Greb is going to get beaten down and then taken out.
     
  11. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    Greb can top any MW in history but has zilch chancewise vs. the Brown Bomber.
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    But how many would be champ if not for ND rules?
     
  13. klompton

    klompton Boxing Addict banned

    5,667
    39
    Jul 6, 2005

    i dont understand your point.
     
  14. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Is this thread what Klompton is referring to with the old fogey reference in the other thread?

    If not, it is a good thread that deserves a rerunning every 12 months or so anyway.
     
  15. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,253
    Feb 6, 2009
    agreed