Froch vs. Dirrell

One guy is a black American the other dude is named Froch, hes white and from Nottingham.
Froch can also take a punch where as ***** Dirrell falls to the floor and fakes a KO......

Work it out.

 

Boxrec rankings are computerised and therefore a load of old testicles.

 

Spot on!

It's computerized but Froch has more undefeated fights and has fought better opposition.

That alone PROVES it's American controlled and manipulated. Computers go on statistics - not nationality / skin colour therefore mathematically Dirrell cannot be above Froch....yet he is. Shitty US biased agenda.

 

Dirrell can fake a KO, Froch can't even fake skills.

 

LMAO at these butthurt fanboys!:rofl

Hey, dont get mad at us...Blame yourself for being so ****ing thick!:good

 

Probably based on the outcomes of their previous fights.

That said, bit of a toss way of ranking, based on 1 fight...

 

If Dirrell had not been robbed blind in Nottingham, nobody could ***** about the ratings. He's the better fighter anyways by miles. Too bad Froch was his 1st Super 6 fight. If they meet again Froch is getting his ass tore up. Dirrell has 2 extra gears that Froch has no answer for. He can't do anything with him at all. It's gonna be a blow out when those 2 meet again.

 

in general, so called boxing fans do regard dirrel as the better fighter.it's because their idiots.and americans.everyone knows how biased they are.

the bottom line is this.

because of his flashy style, they think this means he must be the better fighter.the better talent.when they look at froch, they see a fighter who gets by on toughness, heart, will, and a solid chin.they think that, because dirrel has got the prettier style, this is all he needs to be considered the better fighter.well, their wrong.

when they fought in the ring, they put their talents against each other.froch came out on top.

froch is the better fighter.froch has the better resume.froch has the better talent.

talent is were you put everything you have on the line and do what ever it takes to win.this is what froch did.that's why he has the better talent.

 

I'd agree that Dirrell is certainly the better boxer than Froch, it's harder to not be a better boxer given Froch's style. He likes to block punches with his chin, throws wide punches etc. Completely disagree that Nottingham was a robbery though. It was a close fight, could have gone either way and it went to Froch. And you're also right in saying that Dirrell has 2 extra gears then Froch, it's just a shame he's NEVER demonstrated them and instead opts to conveniently slip when in a threatening position...

I believe Dirrell will be "exposed" against Ward. I dislike using that word but I can't think of a better case than this. He's fighting someone with a synonymous skill set to his own, only Ward doesn't act so bloody cowardly and instead actually uses the "extra 2 gears" as a technical lever to get the win. It'll be close for the first half of the fight but when Dirrell feels the heat coming on, we'll start seeing the damp corners again, and I'll be surprised if he takes any of the last 3 rounds.

 

i hope they do fight again.because if dirrel comes with a more positive attatude, and opens up with his punches, he's getting knocked out.then we can put all this rubbish about these two to bed.

 

That would certainly be the way to settle things. But Dirrell has way bigger fish to fry than Froch. Ward is the f'n man at 168. He may lose that fight as it is about a toss up. A legend will be born and they will probably lock up again down the road after cleaning up the rubish remnants from the Super 6 and Montreal.

And Nottingham was a joke. Froch deserves credit for going dirty to make a bit of a game of it late but he was thougherly whooped every round to start. Looked like the fool he is. Even the brit announcers I was watching on stream had Froch losing. And that was before Dirrell proved himself to himself at the elite level. Froch was a big jump for him and he still clowned him and scraped a win. Now he will smoke him...win, lose or draw with Ward.

 

Because Boxrec is about as useful as a chocolate teapot (for ranking fighters).

 

The Ring magazine and Boxing News both scored for Froch and Froch outlanded Dirrell

 

He did not. Dirrell outlanded him in total punches and in power shots. There was no compubox for the fight. That's why Dirrell got screwed...he had superior defense and LANDED MORE PUNCHES.