You predicted ***an, Barrera, Kotelnik and Malignaggi to all knock out Khan and you're telling other people they have no credibility on the issue? :rofl:rofl:rofl
Maskaev certainly qualifies - but it's interesting to note that when you put his china chin up against Rahman's glass jaw, it's was Rahman's that gave way. His chin is actually PROVEN worse than Maskaev's!
Oh **** man you have opened my eyes!! I am awake!!!! So fuc king what if some boxers have glass jaws???
"That punch woulda KOd anybody" is total speculation and mostly screamed by fan-boys after their hero got brutally starched.
You may have woken up, but you have not seen the light! So there is still work for ESB's Chincheckers to do!!!!
Amir Khan's chin is rather underrated. I aint sittin here claiming his chin is great but his chin is decent. Khan has only been knocked down by massive bombs.
You're a cretin. It doesn't matter how long your ignorant ass has been watching the sport because you appear to have learnt **** all about it. Of course punch resistance varies and of course some guys have shaky chins and others what you could call a glass jaw. But you are OBSESSED with chin over all other things to a degree that you constantly base predictions on it and are wrong, again and again and again and again. So Hatton is glass jawed to you now. And yet managed to beat Tsyzu, win multiple world titles and did so having a come forward, quite open style. You predicted that Haye would lose by brutal KO to the first heavyweight he fought. You predicted that Oisin ***an would KO Khan. Then you predicted that MAB would KO Khan. Then you predicted that Kotelnik would KO Khan, then you predicted that Malignaggi "might KO Khan". You are so weirdly aroused by the topic of punch resistance that you think anyone who tries to point out that your obsession is juvenlile and idiotic, is somehow in denial. Everyone in British boxing knew about Khans chin problems from the Craig Watson fight and we all raised concerns over it long before you jumped on board with your banal ravings. But most of us also pointed out that due to his speed and ability he could still do well in the sport, but the chin would always be a worry. RJJ apparently has a glass jaw. How **** was his career? Managed to dust Toney, Hopkins and reign as the number 1 in more than one weight division and even get a strap at Heavyweight having started at Middle. How did Floyd Patterson do in his career? Having a shaky chin is a big disadvantage, but you act like chin is everything. It isn't. Wlad has a shaky chin compared to many of the guys at heavyweight, but the rest of his game has seen him be hugely successful. Most fighters get stopped at some point in their career. If most people get KOd then clearly human beings in general have "dodgy chins" so it makes the whole thing rather irrelevant. Jack Dempsey was starched in one round by Fireman Jim Flynn, but he came back and avenged it and went on to much more. But all you ever do is repeat your pathetic KO predictions for any fighter you have decided is glass jawed, and if you are wrong 10 times in a row and then get it right on the 11th, you crow and act as if your the ****ing second coming. Try using that strategy on gambling and see how much you make at the end of the year.
This is bull****. Wlad has a weak chin yet he's been dominating all heavyweights for the past 5 years and might be among the 25 best heavyweight boxers to ever walk this planet. Khan has won world titles and barely lost rounds since his loss to Prescott. Lennox Lewis according to some isn't very durable (I personally disagree), yet he's beaten a tremendous amount of punchers (Tua, Morrison, Vitali Klitschko, Bruno, Ruddock, Tyson etc etc) and is EASILY a top10 heavyweight of all time. I could list a plethora of others, but do you care to comment how "you aren't going to last long in the sport if you can't take a punch" when I've clearly proven the opposite? Sorry to smash your wet McCall dream, but punch resistance is NOT the most critical variable in boxing. Neither is power. Neither is speed or determination. Each of them carries weight but you have to look at the total package. James Toney lacks dedication but has a great chin. Look at how far that got him against Roy Jones. Bernard Hopkins is good in all areas but exceeds in none; he became a great fighter by being good but not exceptional in every area. George Chuvalo, David Tua and Oliver McCall all seem to be impervious to punches, however, several other factors have prevented all of them from winning the title. Also, I don't think you realize just how ****ing hard a professional boxer hits. How good even a gatekeeper is. I've felt how hard Raymond Joval, a gatekeeper by ESB standards, hits, and I can guarantee you that those punches did not imply a KO percentage of 38%. You don't have a clue on boxing and you're like an autistic broken record suffering from a bad case of OCD on chins and Lennox Lewis. Try to get that in your pot infested hippie mind before posting again. :good
Am I crazy? all those were hard shots and landed clean,such disrespect to world class fighters who put their neck out there for us.......
I'm sorry, but your name is a misnomer. You and your fellow 'tards don't check chins - the opponents in the ring do that. You merely rate them, so you should be the Chinraters - which just sounds rubbish