The loser of Ward vs Dirrell will become/be deemed the next American hype job

Anyone who sees any resemblence of lacy in dirrell or ward simply doesn't know what they are talking about or refuse to look at them objectively. All you need is eyes to see what they do and what Lacy did. Wouldn't have mattered if Lacy retired before he fought JC, he would have been looked at by hard core fans as under Dirrell and Ward because all you need is eyes to understand. No records or any type of numbers are needed. You can put tape of all three and anyone could tell that ward and dirrell were better than lacy. Everyone knew what lacy was and regardless of how much you think this and that of americans. Hardcore fans were picking JC even in the states. I promise you whoever fights ward or dirrell is in for a big challenge.

Exposed is for the skillfully limited, inadaptable fighters. Fighters who can adapt do not get exposed. People who get exposed get shown a strategy that they just can't adjust to which lays a blue print for any other fighter. That will not happen to either dirrell or ward because they are versitile fighters. When they lose, they will just lose to the better fighter on that night. THEY WILL NEVER BE DOMINATED IN THIER PRIMES AND IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO THEY ARE IN THE RING WITH PERIOD (ENCLUDING EACHOTHER)........ Hype jobs get dominated for thier inadaptability. Lacy was limited. Dirrell and Ward are not. I would go on to say that nobody in the last 20 years at SMW would be a Garenteed Win over Ward or Dirrell.

 

I would much rather you do me the honor of hearing your break down of your disagreements Mr. Bailey. I already know your response so just go ahead and try to show what I put in red as being a joke.

 

First off that doesn't cover everything you highlighted red. Doubt you could since you most likely agreed with what was in white.

Second: You can keep equating the Ring ***azine or any other media in any subject to the perceptions of 100% of the American people all you want. It will always and forever be a phony basis to stand on. So when doing so you should Specify Media while seperating it from absolute (100%) public consenses. Dam that's what words like most and a lot are for: To Clarify. I would never say something stupid like a nations Media is an absolute representation of thier people for any nation. It really means nothing to someone who knows that the Media is a Business like any other.

 

:rofl good work bails.good work.:good

 

Do you notice that all of the stupid ****** British posters claim to be "elite" posters.


Is that because they dont have any elite fighters?

 

:yikes wards parents are both brits?

man, i never knew that.

do you know what part of the uk they're from?

 

you need to read some of the **** the americans are saying on this site.

dirrell gets a bit of overblown hype, but it's ward that people go overboard with.

i've seen a lot of people say that ward is already better than calzaghe.

it's too stupid for words.

 

true, he has stepped up.big time!!

i think he has a good career ahead of him.just hope he stops with all the cheating.

 

Calzaghe fought bums his entire career. Ward dominated Calzaghe's "best" win.

There is ample room to think Ward might be better. Its hard for me to imagine Ward needed a SD to beat Robin Reid for instance.

 

:rofl you're a nutter HB.but you're funny as hell!

 

most americans were going for a lacy win.and an easy win as well.

all the boxing sites were filled with this ****.in the build up to the fight, every american who had a camara shoved in their faces said the same thing.so don't try and make out this never happened.it did.

and if you were being honest on here, you'ed admit to picking lacy as well.probably by ko.

 

what do you mean "all"?

i never claimed to be. get your **** right next time.