Who was the best fighter from each decade?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Sep 25, 2010.


  1. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,471
    15,799
    Jul 19, 2004
    I personally believe Lennox has a better claim than Evander.
     
  2. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    This is a good list, although in relation to 1900-1909, even though he was way past his best, i think that Bob Fitzsimmons was pound for pound quite likely the best. Certainly he had no peers for the 1890 to 1899 decade.
     
  3. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I dont disagree in relation to his heavyweight accomplishments, but i was thinking more on a pound for pound basis. Evander has his dominant reign as cruiser champ (although admittedly it was before 1990), and while he did lose to Bowe in his series and also to Lennox, it is offset by him giving away huge weight and size to both. As a pound for pound fighter i think Evander was probably just ahead of Lennox in the 90s, although i can see arguments for Lewis as well.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,751
    47,578
    Mar 21, 2007
    1900-1909 -Joe Gans
    1910-1919- Sam Langford
    1920-1929- Harry Greb
    1930-1939- Henry Armstrong
    1940-1949- Sugar Ray Robinson
    1950-1959- Archie Moore
    1960-1969- Muhammad Ali
    1970-1979- Roberto Duran
    1980-1989- Sugar Ray Leonard
    1990-1999- Pernell Whitaker
    2000-2009- Manny Pacquiao
     
  5. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,247
    Feb 6, 2009
    1940-1949 would be the hardest decade to pick i think
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,751
    47,578
    Mar 21, 2007

    I think Ketchel has a better claim than Fitz, pesonally.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,751
    47,578
    Mar 21, 2007
    That's interesting, why do you say that? Robinson in his peak and beaten only once made this an easy pick for me.
     
  8. turpinr

    turpinr Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,227
    1,247
    Feb 6, 2009
    joe louis, ezzard charles and sugar ray.i would any of them
     
  9. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    133
    Feb 6, 2009
    No.
     
  10. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    1900-1909 -Joe Gans
    1910-1919- Sam Langford
    1920-1929- Harry Greb
    1930-1939- Henry Armstrong
    1940-1949- Sugar Ray Robinson
    1950-1959- Archie Moore
    1960-1969- Vicente Saldivar
    1970-1979- Alexis Arguello
    1980-1989- Sugar Ray Leonard
    1990-1999- Pernell Whitaker
    2000-2009- Manny Pacquiao
     
  11. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    Blantantly yes, in a pound for pound match-up Ali gets schooled.
     
  12. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    No Duran? You joker you.
     
  13. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    133
    Feb 6, 2009
    Explain why and how.
     
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    He crosses over the 70s and the 80s, I think there is better candidates in each decade that surpass his half of career in that decade.
     
  15. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    Napoles' vastly better technical acumen and overall depth of skillset would be the main reason. Like most (all) of Mantequilla's opposition he'd have his offence shut down and end up missing and getting countered. Add in his ability to cut off the ring and Ali's vulnerability to types who are efficient at closing the distance and you have a stylistic near-nightmare.

    And I'm no Ali hater. Just shows you how weak Heavyweight history is by comparison.