Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

Hes far too dumb to realise atsch

As said above Realegg&soulja is far too dumb, to realise that he was wned as soon as he set foot on this thread .
He is my ***** and personnal fanboy, who likes to follow me like a lost soul, trying desperately hard to become my friend .
Still he never learns, gets schooled and then thinks hes Pwned someone atsch

 

Agreed but Taylor did have Hopkins #, and Sturm can do all Taylor can, but is faster with better movement. Whats terrible logic about that? You havent come up with any logic at all other than a pityfull, So what if hes a better champ than the guy who beat him. atsch

 

So your counter arguement is what atsch.

 

What an absolute waste of a post. It would be a good post if you did Beyer vs Calzaghe apart from the fact you wouldnt remember Beyers career personally as you would have been about 11 when he first won his first world title, and would be having to look at Boxrec for details. You keep mentioning Boxrec in regards to myself, but then sound silly when you talk about Eubank who was fighting before you were born atsch, whilst I dont need to rely on Boxrec because I watched the fights first time round. So I think its you on Boxrec :think

 

No numpty, theres a thing called time difference and having to earn a living. Seeing as it was near on midnight and I work I decided to go to bed. Ive got no reason to bail out because no one can give a counter arguement as to how Hopkins can beat Sturm atsch