Highly unlikely but you never know, Haye has been dropped many times before by far lighter boxers than Harrison. I'll be having a bottle of champagne to myself if somehow fraudley no.1 Harrison beats fraudley no.2 Haye.
Audley used to talk **** about himself, his destiny to be champ etc. This is the first time he really bashes an opponent. Haye's T - shirts certainly beat anything Audley ever did. And yes, Haye is the definition of a paper champ. Valuev lost the title in the ring against Chagaev,who was beaten to a pulp by Wlad. Besides, Valuev only had the title for years due to robberies. Haye beat Valuev, who probably wasn't in the top 10 in H2H terms at the time.
no he is not paper title means to win a vacant title, haye's title wasn't vacant, he beat a belt holder.
you obviously have not seen enough of audley he claimed the klits are ***s and would knock em both out. lets see if his dick still tastes sweet after hearing that kkklit boy.
Haye said that Audley should bring the axe to the ring with him as it might give him ''something to think about''. Bit rich coming from Haye, if he brought some balls to the negotiating table he might actually have an actual world title fight.
Papertitle = ain't worth ****. Ie it's made out of paper. Seeing as haye "won" and ripped the title of the great snv. The same great snv who of course "beat" and embarriaed chagajev and Holly. I would say that the title isn't paper but is drenched in gold and heritage....
i see you're changing the definition of paper title to suit your argument haye could have beaten sergio mora for all it matters it would not have been a paper title. paper title = vacant title always meant that and always will, only new boxing fans like yourself make up definitions for it.
Will he be able to do any type of running in that coat, thinking of it did they rob a hobo on the way.