Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

Sturm would outbox Hopkins at long range, use fast hands, excellent jab and fast movements to befuddle Hopkins. Hopkins would look to hit and hold, but with Sturm being a natural MW, Hopkins wouldnt have as big a strength advantage as hes used to having, and Sturm would box his way to a close decision. As said before Sturm has proven a better champ than Taylor, who beat Hopkins twice.
Someone said that Sturm is a toilet paper champ :dead, and Martinez the real champ etc. But Martinez in their eyes is champ for beating Pavlik, who would be champ for beating Taylor, and we agree that Sturm is a better fighter and champ than Taylor .
There was a ridiculous post up showing Hopkins beat Johnson, a guy that loses when he steps up and is nothing like Sturm who is faster with better movement and a great jab.

So far the only person that has tried to justify a Hopkins win has said Sturm couldnt handle the fouls atsch. He shouldnt have to atsch.

We know Hopkins has a weakness to certain styles and Sturm fits those styles. Probably why Hopkins avoided him at all costs

 

All Hopkins fans wned. They cant come up with how Hopkins could beat Sturm

 

Sturm the WBA S champ, who Hopkins avoided

 

I forgive you *****. You did bump my thread like a good *****. Stick with it

 

You really are that stupid to not understand time zones across countries atsch. Some of us work for a living, and decide at midnight to shut down. You are either unemployed or stupid not to understand

 

Read an old post on this thread below

Logic you cant debate. :deal

 

Then you should have known why I was logging off dummy

So other than talking about who beat who etc, you cant dispute the arguement. In that case do you think Mercado would have beaten Sturm? I dont. Sturm was cheated out of a win against Oscar who beat Vargas a while earlier atsch.
Sturm beat decent fighters like Schenk, and Sylvester the current IBF MW champ. Fact