What year was Ali's 70's peak ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Sep 30, 2010.


  1. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,108
    8,542
    Jul 17, 2009
    The consensus re Muhammad Ali's overall peak was that 1966/67 was when we saw the best that he became. There's debate on when he was at his SEVENTIES best,though. Some say FOTC. I'd go for 1974. That's when he was the nearest to what he was in the 60's. Obviously used different skills. Thoughts ?
     
  2. silenc

    silenc dropout bear Full Member

    1,139
    18
    Nov 15, 2009
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,104
    13,045
    Jan 4, 2008
    I'd say 71-74. Whenever he got into good shape during these years he looked quite impressive. He looked at his best in Zaire and in the rematches against Quarry, Norton and Frazier. He was pretty damn sharp in FOTC as well, but gassed quickly - which of course had very, very much to do with Frazier. Other mentions would be the fights against Ellis, Bugner and Chuvalo.

    He had some really good perfomances these years, but after Zaire he would never get below 220 (hardly below 225) again, at least without the help of Thyrolar. So I see that fight as the end of his 70's peak, and FOTC or the fight against Ellis as the beginning of it. Manilla was probably even a sharper turning point, though.
     
  4. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,108
    8,542
    Jul 17, 2009
    Very much in tune with how I feel. Muhammad's movement was pretty good in the 1975 Bugner rematch.
     
  5. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,104
    13,045
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah, it was alright. But he looked better two years earlier.

    But he still had enough left to come in pretty unmotivated in average/poor shape and stop Wepner and Lyle and comfortably beat Bugner. This 8 years after his peak. Puts things into perspective a bit.
     
  6. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    74 was Ali`s peak year in the 70s IMO.
     
  7. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    1974 was clearly his best year of that decade. Harry Carpenter wrote that the second match with Frazier was the first bout of his comeback where he truly regained his speed of the 1960s. He was battle ready off the second fight with Norton, where he exerted his legs more than at any other time after exile. (Rudi Lubbers realized a very respectable achievement in remaining on his feet through all 12 rounds with the 217 pound Ali between Norton II and Frazier II. Lubbers would become the lightest opponent to last the limit with Muhammad after Doug Jones in March 1963.)

    Ali had a great 1975, but he seemed to be on a different level when 220 and under. While he could be strong and durable above that weight, I do think anything over 220 was less than optimal for him.
     
  8. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,108
    8,542
    Jul 17, 2009
    It certainly does put things in perspective. He was definitely a one off.
     
  9. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,108
    8,542
    Jul 17, 2009
    Yeah. As we've so often said on here,it's a shame Ali did n't maintain his sub 220 weight for a bit longer.
     
  10. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    i honestly think he was the best in the first 5 rounds of Frazier I.
     
  11. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,108
    8,542
    Jul 17, 2009
    He was really good in that. He had n't quite shaken off the ring rust,at that point though.
     
  12. itrymariti

    itrymariti CaƱas! Full Member

    13,728
    46
    Sep 6, 2008
    You ****ing stupid Frazier-loving ****, Ali was beyond washed-up vs. Frazier, although he did magically recover to peak several years later.

    /ESB Ali nuthugging culture
     
  13. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I really don't think so. He had 2 tune up fights before, one of which was a KO of a fighter who had never been stopped before in Bonavena. His timing and judge of distance were pretty good to me. I think when people are thinking ring rust of post-prime Ali they are only considering his legs. In this fight he sat down on his punches and threw accurately against a hard to hit frazier. His 1, 2 and combinations were sharp and precise. He was clinching on the inside and mauling properly using his underrated body strength.

    I think people expected him to dance away against Frazier like in the 60's. He would never have won that way, IMO. Frazier applied some of the most consistent and intelligent cutting of the ring and pressure to ever grace the division. You cannot escape from a fighter like that for 15. You will be caught and killed.

    I think that it's possible to show one of your best performances in a loss, draw, or close decision, and this fight is part of the reason why.

    As much as there is a lot of hyperbole surrounding Ali, the man ****ing deserves it. He proved himself time and time and time and time again. I dislike Ali. I dislike his style. I dislike his mouth, and his attitude toward his opposition. But I cannot dispute that he arguably has the best claim for greatest heavyweight ever.
     
  14. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,108
    8,542
    Jul 17, 2009
    Both Ali and Frazier certainly went above and beyond the call of duty in their fights with each other. I'd really love to see Ali and Joe become friends,after all this time.
     
  15. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I wouldn't. Ali was a huge dick to him. I wouldnt want to be friends with some ******* that publicly assassinated me over a ****ing sporting event.