Hopkins MW resume vs Sturms MW resume. Whos is really better & who would win?

I do, becasue you are a ***** who was getting raped by EVERYONE here.

atsch Irrelevent. But to a simple minded kid like you, I'm sure you think that's gold.

You have no argument, just a childish opinion backed by faulty logic. You're a troll, we all see that.

 

Sturm would have lost twelve-and-a-half rounds to B-Hop at MW, believe that

 

Another idiot troll thread. Sturm has never even been the lineal champion and his resume is garbage.

 

I have actually contemplated this matchup. Sturm had/has the ability to decision and possibly TKO Bernard Hopkins. He has highly polished boxing skills and fast hands which Bernard would simply have no answer for. Hopkins was nearly KO-ed by Calzaghe and would probably lose a 117-111 UD to Sturm.

EXCELLENT thread.

 

Herbzg & Bailey <<<<<Hmm twin brothers? Or the same person? If they are twin brothers then they are the dumbest twin brothers OF ALL TIMES!



LMFAO @ STURM HAD/HAS THE ABILITY TO POSSIBLY TKO HOPKINS. FOR F4CK SAKE STURM IS THE SAME FIGHTER THAT LOST BY TKO TO FREAKING CASTILLEJO ! LOL.

 

Bailey picked Pascal to beat Dawson. That made me think he must have something going on between the ears, but nope; just toys in the attic and they're all broken!

 

at least Sturm didint fight randy griffin 3 times....

hopkins fought robert allen 3 times.....what a waste

hopkins had a pretty weak resume for having 20 defenses ...not until the end of his reign did he have some good juicy welterweight names to add to it

 

How can you say that? When Hopkins has fought decent fast 2 handed fighters his own size he has been beaten. Sturm matches that criteria and is a better fighter than Taylor who beat Hopkins twice

 

No new news that you cant debate Robert

 

Excellent to read that someone has analysed the fight and looked at the strengths and weaknesses of both fighters to come up with an educated opinion.
Good work :good

 

Read below and further below

Well done for remembering that particular time of many when I have schooled people and correctly called fights, and spotted hype jobs before it has come to light.
I figured by the first part of your quote that you had learnt something and could be guided, but now I see, that even when things have been proven to you, that once the dust has settled you fall back into the same mistakes.
Too bad, I guess you really are fooled by hype

 

You're a troll... pointless to discuss with.

I mean, if you think someone SERIOUSLY needs to explain to you how Hopkins beats someone like Sturm, you are dumber then you realize. Or better yet, go watch his fight vs. Winky.

Yeah, Javier Castillejo can beat Sturm...but the best MW of the past 15 years? No chance....because Sturm has FAST HANDS AND FAST FEET.

****in simpleton....