Pacman exposed "sparring partners have to wear 16 ounce gloves"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by spud1, Sep 30, 2010.


  1. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    stick to the topic white boy.
     
  2. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    26 pages of ******s arguing about nothing. Spud your an idiot, Divac spelt out what i think is the best explanation for him wearing larger gloves and sounds fair and justifible.
    Everyone giving spud **** just because you dont like him is wrong. i disagree with him might call him stupid but at the end of the day hes entitled to his opinion
     
  3. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    Yawn....:dead
     
  4. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    In a Sparring session its about getting your timing and technique down. Honestly can show people links were people are saying amir khan whipped pacquiao in sparring or peterson schooled mayweather.
    Means nothing probably trying **** out. I have done sparring before where i have been asked not to throw back until a certain situation or secnario and its completly fair and rational for the aggressor to have bigger gloves
     
  5. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    Keep it simple...stupid.:lol: Each trainer and each camp implement different practices and exercises that are suppose to work for that particular fighter or for the fighter they are preparing for.

    The glove size that PAC wears vs the Glove size his sparmates wear are for OBVIOUS reasons. Don't over think it. It's not a good look.
     
  6. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    of all the people that called spud an idiot(including myself!) look at the size of this thread. spuds on to something im going to start some threads saying ali and frazier wouldnt deal with audley harrisons height advantage
     
  7. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    You got a really "unique" thought process. It's like one big cluster **** you got going on upstairs. You always OVER think the simplest of things? Yawn..:dead
     
  8. rorymullan

    rorymullan Guest

    Nice name Kid Presentable. Thats some episode of the simpsons.

    To be fair though sunny and spud are just trolling here. Their getting exactly the reaction they want.
     
  9. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    People have smack you in the face with the answer but it seems to be hard for you to grasp. Stop.....you are looking simple yourself.
     
  10. sunny

    sunny Active Member Full Member

    584
    0
    Apr 21, 2010

    "I'm I'm pretty sure now...." - very poor
     
  11. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    No full stop, very poor.
     
  12. johnnydrama

    johnnydrama Guest

    "when you start correcting sentence structure, grammar or puncutation in a debate it's clear you are losing"

    Not that this is an actual debate.
     
  13. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    If you have to correct my syntax then you're losing the argument already.

    Please read slower though, if that's possible. See you around spud2.

    Oh yeah, welcome to the debate
     
  14. shaunster101

    shaunster101 Yido Full Member

    24,013
    16
    Nov 29, 2007
    Damn, you quick!
     
  15. assasin

    assasin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,315
    13
    Feb 21, 2010
    :lol: for the last 8 pages, you've been **** stirring.i think it's working as well.