Higher P4P: Michael Spinks or Carlos Zarate?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Addie, Sep 30, 2010.

  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    42,502
    Likes Received:
    401
    One of the greatest Light Heavyweights of all time facing off against arguably the greatest Bantamweight of all time? Taking into account quality of opposition, ability, achievements, and longevity, which of these two greats should be ranked the highest? Try and explain your answer the best you can, and be sure to vote on the Poll.

    Discuss!
     
  2. horst

    horst Guest

    Zarate is not the greatest bantamweight of all-time, no argument about it IMO.

    And I rank Spinks considerably higher.
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    55,986
    Likes Received:
    10,399
    Stop putting time limits on your polls, Addie. It makes me nervous. I don't deal well with pressure.
     
  4. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    10,305
    Likes Received:
    544
    Spinks.

    ultimately i think Zarate was more of a frontrunner.

    I'd also favour Chucho Castillo and Rafae Herrera over Barrera and Morales.;)
     
  5. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    10,744
    Likes Received:
    78
    +1
     
  6. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    13,728
    Likes Received:
    46
    I voted Zarate for the craic mainly to even things up a bit. Without splitting hairs I'd say they're pretty close H2H, and obviously Spinks achieved much more which would give him the edge on most lists.
     
  7. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    13,728
    Likes Received:
    46
    Who d'you think was better H2H?
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,748
    Likes Received:
    44,302
    Spinks, but i rate Zarate massively.
     
  9. itrymariti

    itrymariti Cañas! Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    13,728
    Likes Received:
    46
    :good
     
  10. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    42,502
    Likes Received:
    401
    I don't envision doing the same but I still have a Chucho fight to watch.
     
  11. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2005
    Messages:
    13,635
    Likes Received:
    332
    Mike obviously the smarter and more coordinated boxer.
     
  12. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    38,034
    Likes Received:
    91
    Zarate has a shout for the number 1 Bantamweight spot IMO, and it is better than some more common claims.

    I have them fairly close. I think Zarate looks to be the better fighter but Spinks was as dominant at Light Heavyweight and has the wins over Holmes.

    Zarate has better wins in his Bantamweight reign than Spinks has in his Light Heavyweight reign though.

    So it is very close.
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    112,912
    Likes Received:
    47,904
    Spinks by virtue of his best work at HW.

    Zarate was a better fighter I think.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,748
    Likes Received:
    44,302
    Match these

    Dwight Qawi
    Eddie Mustafa
    Marvin Johnson
    Eddie Davis

    The single biggest knock i see on Zarate is quality of opposition. I am a huge fan.
     
  15. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    42,502
    Likes Received:
    401
    Zarate's opposition has been gradually getting better over the course of the last year. He's now got an incredible resume.