Question about the Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez I, scoring controversy

You're basing this on not watching the fight?

 

There used to be a link up from an article that depicted the scores of about 20 or so boxing beat writers

......only two or three of those writers had Pac winning, and all three of them had it by the same score 113-112

......that means that polling 20 boxing writers, not one gave Pac more than 5 rounds, and yet you're going to tell me that the one jude who scored 7 rounds to Pacquiao is a judgement error??????

:nonoThats not a judgement error, its called "corruptness" my friend.

You can poll every ******* in every boxing forum on the internet, and you'd be hard pressed to find one with the audacity to claim they had Pac winning more than 5 rounds on their card......and I"m talking *******s.....
....that one official judge who had Pacquiao winning 7 rounds must have been Pacquiao's kin!

 

go 1 min into this video

[yt]9G3kZz34XeE[/yt]

i won't debate this with you Divac i already know how you feel about it.

 

Yes I know, Harold Lederman is the only other idiot who scored 7 rounds to Pacquiao.......I rest my case, just about everyone in this forum has little respect for the inconsistent way that Lederman scores fights.
The fact that you even bring up his score actually makes my case, Lederman is not a respected scorer among boxing forums like this.

 

actually, it destroys your case. Because you said that to score 7 rounds to Pac, you'd have to be corrupt. Harold Lederman although a terrible scorer is definately not corrupt, yet he scored 7 rounds to Pac. Are you suggesting Harold was paid off to give more rounds to Pacquiao?

 

Pac got a gift...He won 3 rounds at most......Anyone who can say with a straight face that pac won 4 or more is either a ******, or worse, a *******.

 

People are ****ing idiots to make absolute statements who won close fights. And make it worst by claiming conspiracies and corruption to those not agreeing with them.

 

HBO pays HL, the HBO crew knows who they need to cheer for, who they need try to convince the audience who is winning....

Pac was the new HBO star...JMM was not....

This isn't new info...everyone knows HBO cheers and pulls for the fighter with the biggest HBO contract and potential to make the most $$.

 

Conspiracy and Corruption in boxing is actually more realistic than Lucky Sox excuse, Blood samples excuse, and "I'm smaller" excuse. :good

 

So every time a Mexican loses it is likely caused by corruption and conspiracy?

Got it!

 

marquez got a gift of a lifetime. his ass hugging the canvass 3 times, long count, judge admitted a scoring error and pac busted his left hand made jmm a very lucky man .

anyone who disputes this is worst comparable to those " pac got exposed with 16 ounces gloves", "floored" or " "oscar will kill pac with a jab" something like that. those are all time ******ed threads or posts here at ESB LOL

 

Actually the lucky one was Pacquiao...

1. He scored the 3 KDs...Made the fight close
2. Cortez didn't DQ Pac or deduct a point, for an offense worse than Soto commited, yet he got DQd.
3. HBO crew cheering Pac everytime he threw the left
4. Pac got a draw when he was CLEARLY taken to school after rd. 2
5. Big HBO contract after he beat MAB....They were protecting their investment.

 

talk about going off topic.

the FACT is simple.

had the judge correctly given the first round 10-6, pac would have won the fight. that is the point here.

if anyone is lucky it is jmm, because one of the judges forgot to read his rulebook.

 

school me please.

when oscar got a gift from pea, quartey, felix, did HBO broadcast it?