Question about the Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez I, scoring controversy

but the ref counted too long to save marquez :yep

 

Listen, why even go any further? By your own admission Lederman is a terrible scorer.
God only knows whether its because his, ineptness or someone at HBO is telling him to lean a certain way.....
.....the bottom line with Lederman is that he's consistently terrible, so terrible that I'd personally avoid using him as an example for a score that I agreed with him with.
I often times find my card so far from his, that I find myself questioning my own card when it agrees with his.

 

**** you're stupid!

You schooled yourself. :deal

 

Who's arguing who won?
The points some of us are trying to make is about the corruptness thats prevalent with scoring judges......for example, the one official judge with the audacity to score 7 rounds for Pacquiao in that first fight.

 

You're going to use that stupid exucse???

Have you heard of a fighter name Nedal Hussein??? Yes or No???

 

That is a CRIME! 7 rounds for Pac???! atsch Not even the *******s can agree with that...That is not ******edness, that is criminal.

 

yeah.....but are you admitting that the ref counted too long in favor of JMM?

How bout who did the broadcasting when hoya got a gift of a lifetime from pea, quartey and felix sturm?

 

HBO tells them who they want the winner to be....Cortez was in it too obviously.

 

Damn you're ******ed....If you believe DLH lost those fights, than your dumbass is agreeing with me that HBO is corrupt....atsch

Really??? Can *******s get any stupider? :-( :yep

 

the double standard :rofl


you said pac was HBO's star but he was yet unproven during that time.

but when I asked you who did the broadcasting when your BF oscar got the biggest gifts of his life from pea, quartey and felix sturm you turned away just like when I confront you with that "oscar would kill pac with a left jab" thing :yep:nut

 

Uli, you do yourself a disservice by answering this goons posts......he's a known troll around here. The best thing to do with trolls is to difuse them by ignoring their posts.
His posts are self explanatory. He hangs himself with everyone of them that there is no reason to even give a response to.

 

again going off topic. the thread aint about who should have won by opinion. it is who should have won by fact. and the fact is, had the judge correctly scored round 1, pac would have won the fight.

 

mexicans are having a hard time understanding that it took only one asian midget to wipe all their heroes :good

butt hurting is hard in this business. it is hard to move on and denial is the key to survive :deal

 

The facts are if there were three honest judges scoring, its Marquez who wins.

You're telling me that you dont give a damn whether the judges are corrupt or not, as long as they dont make an "honest" mistake in knockdowns, you're oK with it.:nut

The judge who scored the 1st round 10-7, admitted he was under the impression he could'nt make a round lower than a 10-7......this judge made an honest mistake and his explanation of it proved it was an honest mistake.

.......you are not OK with that, but you are OK with the baffoon of a corrupt judge who dishonestly jotted down 7 rounds down Pacquiao's column..nut:nut

 

the thread is a question about wether or not the first round should have been 10-6. and it should.

go make a new thread if you are so bothered about the rest of the fight.