Truth of the matter is your sorry ass was wrong and instead of admitting to it you said well umm i need to see the contracts... atsch yeah bul**** how many contracts have you seen.
Funny Valuev should of lost to holyfield and did lose to Chagaev who beat Valuev more significantly then Haye.. what makes Haye and Valuev top 5 in his era exactly?.... the wba circle jerk where they award don king fighters a merry go round of title shots... and they award valuev the belt for refusing to face their champion Chagaev, Haye has beat who Barret, Ruiz and Valuev... All what 38+ years old... their era the top 5 would probably be. Ibragimov, Byrd, Peter, Brewster, Chagaev.
I have a couple of questions. Who was the first heavyweight champion of the world? How was he crowned? How could their have not been somebody better before that guy?
It sucks that you actually had to type that all out for the ignorant posters to understand. But I'm glad you did. :good
I can consider Wlad champ as Ring says so and they are to be respected and have no monetary stakes in their usually fair system, however I overlook his "unification" Simply because he is the first champ ever to "unify" the WBO at heavyweight and that is not a goods thing , it was never seen as important there before and I dont like him essentially adding it to the already dirty collection and god help when Wlad demolishes Haye cause then a new WBA reg champ is gonna appear they have been dying to do that for years at HW
It don't matter. Putting up a press clip of Wlad BS'ing about wanting a rematch is not proving your point. Try again...
Lewis beat Briggs who beat Foreman who beat Moorer who beat Holyfield who beat Douglas who beat Tyson who beat Spinks who beat Holmes. On the night Lewis and Holyfield fought - Lewis was defending, *not* Holyfield. Who has Wlad ever beat?
Hey Genius, Vitali has a *better* claim to the HW Championship than does his glass-jawed brother. Get a clue...