Do you feel these heavyweight fights consisted of robberies, etc.??

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MRBILL, Oct 6, 2010.


  1. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    In no real order of the crime / criminal judges themselves, I'll list as follows what can be considered questionable verdicts rendered:

    "Ali W15 Young" of '76.

    "Ali W15 Norton 3" of '76.

    "Holmes W12 Spoon" of '83

    "Spinks W15 Holmes 2" of '86.

    "Tyson W10 Tillis" of '86.

    "Foreman W12 Schulz" of '95.

    "Moorer W12 Bean" of '96.

    "Holmes W10 Harris" of '97.

    "Briggs W12 Foreman" of 97.

    Did the judges screw these fight results up???:huh:|:patsch

    NOTE:

    In my book, I am only furious over the decisions rendered in "Holmes-Spinks 2" of '86, and "Foreman-Briggs" of 1997...
    :fire
    Also, I've gone on file numerous times stating I gave Ali the nod over Norton at Yankee Stadium by a **** hair...
    :bbb
    MR.BILL:hat
     
  2. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    briggs w12 foreman you mean?
     
  3. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    Minging ****ing ROBBERIES those ****ers are - judges were ****S!! :twisted::fire
     
  4. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    I fixed it..:good

    MR.BILL:hat
     
  5. The Funny Man 7

    The Funny Man 7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,873
    2,061
    Apr 1, 2005
    Holmes-Harris, Spinks-Holmes II, briggs-foreman, and Norton III were. foreman-shultz and Moorer-bean were definitely debatable.
     
  6. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,551
    11,066
    Jul 28, 2009
    Ahhh, so I now know Foreman's Hook is from the UK. I did not know that. Okay, so "know" isn't quite accurate. But now I'm going to assume.
     
  7. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    Gave Ali the Young fight because Young was almost cowardly.

    Had Norton III to Ali as well, close. Could easily give it to Norton, but the result is far from a robbery.

    Holmes definitely won the rematch with Spinks. Thats a robbery.

    Had Holmes beating Spoon.

    Tyson beat Tillis. Not a debateable verdict.

    Schulz beat Foreman, imo, but I had it closer than most.

    Moorer beat Bean.

    Harris beat Holmes by a hair.

    Foreman easily defeated Briggs. That one was a robbery.
     
  8. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    What the **** is up with this revisionism about Tillis beating Tyson? He was lucky to win 3 rounds.
     
  9. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,551
    11,066
    Jul 28, 2009
    Wherever a fight goes the distance, a fanboy or detractor will be there to claim the loser really won. Rule of life.
     
  10. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    Pretty fair calls here....:thumbsup

    MR.BILL:deal
     
  11. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Then **** life.
     
  12. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    Agreed.:good But that thread of late has over 100+ posts..:deal Why?:patsch

    Tyson won on points pretty conclusive in my eyes....:hat

    MR.BILL:bbb
     
  13. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,551
    11,066
    Jul 28, 2009
    Camacho really out-hustled Chavez. The judges were blind.
     
  14. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    112
    Oct 9, 2008
    No, but Duran at age 45 out-hustled the 34 year old Camacho in 1996... That was robbery... I was livid...
    :twisted:

    MR.BILL:bbb
     
  15. albinored

    albinored Active Member Full Member

    1,007
    17
    Oct 7, 2007
    ....charles/walcott IV...so bad the referee could be heard cheering walcott on and taking away charles' body attack by calling shots to the collarbone low...a robbery all the way...by officials and the referee....