Whos is better? Ottkes 21 defences or Hopkins 20 defences?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bailey, Oct 6, 2010.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    hopkins has a better resume, and it isnt even close.

    ottkes best win is arguably johnson, and hopkins schooled him.

    ottke should have lost to reid and mitchell. those fights were easily as close as hopkins vs taylor 1&2
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,304
    3,416
    Dec 11, 2009
    The sad problem you have is that you dont understand alot of posts and then change what has been said and make up lie, Im not sure what you dont understand. I havent said Ottke is better for making 21 defences over 20, that is more of your lies. More of your lies also told when you say Bailey Mode Tate and Markussen are better than Taylor :patsch. Shameful to go telling lies, but here you have exposed yourself as a liar on a live forum, losing even more respect :lol:
    I understand how deep your feelings for Hopkins are, so I will try not to keep putting my personal stalker into a flood of tears :| as I explain.

    Hopkins had lost twice and drawn once before winning a world title, Ottke was undefeated and won his first world title in his 13th fight

    Hopkins won the WBO & WBA title from smaller fighters. Joppy & Holmes had already been KOd and beaten at a lower level.
    The 2 fighters Ottke beat werent naturally smaller than Ottke. Brewer wasnt a great with 5 losses but he was world class and a tough fight for a 12 fight novice to overcome. Mitchell had never clearly been beaten and was a world class fighter and 2 time world champ.

    Obviously the examples I gave you from those 2 posts were beyond you :patsch. Do you not think that naturally bigger fighters like Larsen would be able to handle a far more talented but smaller fighter like De La Hoya? Now im a fan of Oscar, but except he couldnt perform well above LMW, & remember Hopkins debuted at LHW, so won most fights when the bigger man in the ring :lol:. Fact
    Hopkins had a problem with Taylor and lost. Ottke may have had problems against some fighter but found a way to win, when often the smaller lighter punching fighter :happy

    You note Hopkins fought 5 champs failing to mention 2 of them are smaller fighters, one of them he lost and all 2 divisions lower than where he debuted :lol:.

    Only De La Hoya in a lower division and G Johnson went on to world glory after Hopkins beat them, showing the stages they were at in their careers. Yet Ottke beat 3 fighters who went on to world honours and none of those were in lower weight divisions.

    :nut I really think my ***** Realegg&soulja Pwned me :nut
    You see Realsoulja once again exposed as a liar :lol:. I just cant respect liars
     
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,304
    3,416
    Dec 11, 2009
    Wrong again, but I see your trying to jump on the bandwagon :dead.
    Read the reply and you can see I exposed Rsoulja as a liar :patsch. Shameful :-(.
    I defend fighters who deserve respect and credit wherever they are from :hi:
     
  4. dhralf

    dhralf **** the queen! Full Member

    4,950
    0
    Jan 25, 2007
    You still think Ottke is better.....:lol:.....you should watch more boxing.
     
  5. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,304
    3,416
    Dec 11, 2009
    You see this is where you havent read the first page.
    I havent said I think Ottkes better, I wrote he had a more impressive reign during his 21 title defences compared to Hopkins 20 defences, not career overall.

    Read a bit more carefully if you are going to make comments :patsch
     
  6. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,654
    692
    Oct 17, 2009

    hey dhralf, your vcash total is zero :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:







































    :rofl
     
  7. UndisputedChamp

    UndisputedChamp Member Full Member

    300
    0
    Aug 17, 2009
    That's the smile of a true champion that crushed every opponent that dared to enter the ring with him. No wonder why Hopkins or the princess of Wales stayed as far as away possible from him. In 20 years people are going to be writing books about Sven's illustrious career.
     
  8. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    710
    Dec 8, 2009
    Isnt he in that movie only Mummy and Daddy can watch?????
     
  9. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,304
    3,416
    Dec 11, 2009
    Once again it has been proven that elite posts have shone through and made these minions fall face down.
    Rayhogan has been exposed as a 'yes' man, who relies on others to try and debate so he can write something like 'I agree', without having a point of view, of his own.
    Realsoulja has once again been exposed as a blatant liar, who has to tell lies when his debates begin to fall apart.

    Excellent work from Headbanger & Timeout, who along with myself have proven a point to the minions who litter ESB
     
  10. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    Monzon had lost 3 times and drawn 9 times before winning a world title. So you think Ottke is better than Monzon :patsch

    Hagler had lost twice and drawn twice before winning a world title. So you think Ottke is better than Hagler :patsch

    HEADBANGER tell your boy man, even you know he took it far there.

    This is the respect I got son:- The real recognise the real:-

    This the respect you got:-

    :lol:

    Man you the one who spent the last 2 weeks on Hopkins Boxrec. I watch his fights and respect the skills he has shown over the years. You been on Hopkins boxrec so long you forgot how he looked like, watch his fights instead of reading his boxrec that you favourited. Even your wife scorecards favoured Hopkins, what you on about son.

    Ask 10 people who do they think won the fight Hopkins or Trinidad, 10 out of 10 will say BHop.
    Ask that about Ottke and Brewer, 10 out of 10 will say Brewer. Ottke didnt even deserve the title.

    So Hopkins did that Middleweight domination while weight drained even more impressive dont you think son.

    Like Ottke found a way to win vs Reid, or Markussen, or Brewer or Starie, or Mitchell.

    Hopkins deserved the decision vs Taylor, more than Ottke deserved it vs Reid/Markussen/Brewer/Starie/Mitchell/Tate1

    Hopkins fought 5 champions showing he took the risks, ottke didnt take them kind of risks son.

    Boy go and watch boxing.
     
  11. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    710
    Dec 8, 2009
    Sorry Bailey , but I haven't seen a beatin' like that since somebody stuck a banana in my pants and turned a ****** loose.

    Let it go man.
     
  12. beecho1988

    beecho1988 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,654
    0
    Apr 13, 2009
  13. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,304
    3,416
    Dec 11, 2009
    I only glanced at this rubbish to realise that you were once again telling lies, because
    This content is protected
    etc. I said Ottkes SMW reign was overall better than Hopkins 20 MW defence reign, not career overall.
    Exposed as a liar again :lol:. Thats 2 posts running where ive proven you as a liar.
    :lol: A kid of 22 writing son and boy :patsch. What a dick :lol:.

    Ive said on many posts on here that many felt Reid beat Ottke and the refereeing was awful (always followed Reids career). But do you really feel Starie beat Ottke? If so you must be the one on Boxrec, because I watched it live on TV when you were about 15 and probably past your bed time.

    Still as said ive only glanced at odd bits because when I saw you were lying again, I didnt waste to much time. Not on a liar :dead
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,304
    3,416
    Dec 11, 2009
    You see when you are a fan of a certain fighter, you dont see both sides. I respect both fighters and look at both careers with an even note.
    If you think thats a beating you are very wrong because it has many lies in it, and liars cant be respected
     
  15. realsoulja

    realsoulja Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,442
    295
    Jul 23, 2008
    :lol:

    What is this debate about, you wrote it in the thread title. WHO IS BETTER :lol:

    :patsch

    Son, this is what you said:

    Why did you mention that fact, it was because it was in response to my previous post about Hopkins clearly having a better reign than Ottke.

    And if you are only talking about their respective reigns then why did you talk about Hopkins losing twice which was not part of his reign. son. You obviously mentioned it to make Ottke seem better. If you mentioned it for some other reason then go ahead.

    Take this advice son. seriously.