The Manny Pacquiao deception, Manny Pacquiao vs Juan Manuel Marquez II

Thats part of the deception. The ******* will argue that the fight was close, but that just was'nt the case.

The fight was competitve, but it was not close.
There's a difference between close and competitive.

You might not understand this because well, you're a *******.....but here is an example.......the first half of the Margarito vs Cotto fight was competitive, but by God it was so far from being close.
In rounds, Cotto was taking almost everyone of those early rounds. I think I had Cotto taking 5 or the first 6.....
......that first half was far from close, but it can be argued that it was extremely competive as Margarito was landing some terrific shots as well, just not nearly as much as the cleaner more accurate shots by Cotto.

To give Pacquiao 5 rounds in his fight with Marquez is to be kind to him......the reality of it has Marquez winning 8+ which would equal a 115-112 score which was a populer one amongst boxing beat writers.:deal

 

Divac

remind everyone how you scored

JCC/Pea
DLH/Tito
JCC/Taylor I before the stoppage


Then everyone will get a sense of how much a credible scorer you are

 

They can debate me on such fights anytime I'm posting on such thread......you ******* have never had the knowleadge to take me on in such threads.....all you know is what the commentators are throwing at your face and that Pacroid wins any fight that goes to the cards no matter how thoroughly outboxed he is.


You fail to back up your stance on any of the Marquez-Pacquiao fights, so you feel compelled to bring up something thats totally unrelated to anything being dicussed here, like other fights.:nut


******* it does'nt matter how I scored those fights.......what matters is all the facts littered in this thread that support a Marquez victory!

The Pinoy broadcast team scored for Marquez!lol::yep

 

:rofl You're still butt hurt cause I put you into your place several years ago about the Pac/JMM I fight. Whenever I explained the fight to you on a rd by rd basis you always leave the thread without leaving any rebuttal or intelligent response. You go back and claim "JMM got robbed it wasnt even close all the writers had it for JMM" and the only writers you were able to find that did have JMM ahead was Fightnews and some other site.

You're scorecard for the fights above just goes to show you have to much of an emotional bias. You dont speak with any clear rational but out of blind love for a fighter. That makes you a very non-credible person especially in a close fight such as this in regards to a fighter who you claim was ducked by Pacquiao,Morales,Hamed and Barrera.

 

He tends to ignore the facts that's practically in front of him or call the arguments invalid because it doesn't match his. :rofl What a hypocrite.

 

Pac beat Void. Caused Void to go crazy beat up woman and chased child, put Void into hiding.

 

so what is a close fight for you? give me an example of a close fight and a 1 sided fight and something in between. which rounds do you consider clear rounds for pac, clear rounds for jmm, and rounds that may have gone either way?

 

Boom_Boom, the one thing that even *******s around here know is that I back my opinions and statements up with facts......something you rarely did around here.

I'm not going to stick around here and get into a mud slinging war with you, I'm sure thats what you would love to do against a poster that actually argues with fact and logic.

I'm condifent in the fact that most in this forum not ******* are of the opinion that I'm credible around here and debate logically.
I'm not so sure the same can be said about yourself.



You schooled me on Marquez-Pacquiao?atsch:nut

 

You mean I ignore the facts like the ones posted by the thread starter???

 

A close fight is Chavez-Taylor......do you prefer the flash of Taylor or the substance debilitating heavy pounding to both body and head by Chavez.....
......thats a close fight that can be argued back and forth who was winning and both arguments would have some merit.

A one sided fight is Chavez-Camacho, Calzaghe-Lacy.

In between you have your Holyfield-Foreman, which to me parralels and plays pretty much like Marquez-Pacquiao only without a knockdown.

As I mentioned earlier, the Marquez-Pacquiao fight was competitive, but not close imo.
Pretty much how I viewed the Holyfield-Foreman fight, competitve in that Foreman had some nice connects and forced Holyfield to work, but not close as far as round by round scoring.

Even if Foreman had scored a knockdown against Holyfield, there is'nt an argument that could be made that he'd won the fight.
A knockdown does not win you a fight, you have to consistently win rounds through the whole 12 that are fought.

 

You mean by your alt? I'm talking about the facts why other boxing fans think that Pacquiao won. You're an idiot that disregards their opinions because it doesn't match yours. atsch

 

so do you think there are rounds in that PAC-JMM fight that could have gone either way? is so what rounds?

 

Again, who had Pacquiao winning besides the historical corrupt judges,*******s, and that Bozo at HBO Harold Lederman who very few in this forum respect?

I'm sure there are a few journalist out there who wrote Pac won on their newspaper, but very few.:deal

......bring out those links to journalist who had Pacroid winning *******s!

 

You have yet to bring any factual basis to why JMM won this fight other than a few writers and some pinoys scoring it for JMM.

Thats not how you decide who won the fight:-(

 

Oh, I stand corrected then......it must be kissing canvas that decides a fight, thats been the ******* logic all along.....

Oh well, once again you've schooled me *******!lol: