Oh, my mistake then. Vitali vs. Haye ain't no 50/50 fight anyway. More like 75-85% for VK........................
Dude, puff, puff, pass already....................:rasta Wladimir knocked out Chris Byrd for the IBF belt & he easily beat Ibragimov for the WBO.
You and I know that he'd rematch Wlad, then Vitali, Wlad again, Klitschkos uncle, Vitali again, Wlad again then the Hayden. Options you see.......
yes and haye beat valuev for the wba belt. i dont like haye that much but if you criticise it must be consistent, and your criticism should apply to wlad by that criteria you set for paper champ. you's see vitali - haye as 75-80% in vitali's favour? he's gotta age sometime, altho in a recent nterview i saw him give, he said he still feels like a 20 year old
Well it would be a massive win and he'd be elevated in the rankings and rightly so. Does he leapfrog others who have a better resume at the weight? Well, he'd be beating the best fighter so he'd deserve to be amongst the tope three or so. It also depends upon the circumstances. Does he blow WALDO out of the water or sneak a debatable win. How far do you then drop WALDO?
i think we all know this, but it is a hypothetical question. would you consder derek the champ if he gets the W over wlad?
that guys debate was this. haye is a paper champ because he beat valuev who wasnt the real champ, because chagaev got stripped. my response stated the exact same criteria can be applied to wlad because sanders and lewis got stripped.
:good ye i very much believe in linearity also. i consider wlad the champ, so if chisora does wn, id consider him the champ.