Manny Pacquaio vs Pernell Whitaker

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mrjotatp4p, Oct 11, 2010.


  1. jeffjoiner

    jeffjoiner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,183
    5
    Jun 22, 2008
    Why isn't this a poll?
     

  2. :lol::lol::lol:
     
  3. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Because you're non-stop bashing pacquiao to get the best of these kids who are just fans of him. You always do it when pacquiao gets a fantasy match up.

    Same reason I get upset when people start uncle tom'ing Mr.Tony80 for picking pac every once in a while.

    You guys are just relentlessly brutal to pac and his fans.
     
  4. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    vcash:96

    Pimp c: Dawson will beat Pascal.
     
  5. :lol::lol::lol::lol:

    oh the irony :thumbsup
     
  6. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Alot of folks lost vcash on Dawson for that fight. One of the biggest upsets of the year. Dawson should have beaten Pascal but mentally wasnt in the fight. Says nothing about pimp c's ability to analyze a fight. Especially when you put any amount of analyzation against that of a *******s.
     
  7. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,141
    Jun 23, 2005
    Pac isn't going to land ****, Pea's defense would befuddle and frustrate Pac who's never fought anyone with an ounce of defense. He's going to come forward and get hit at will by Pea's ATG jab and countered to death when he tries to open up beaten up on the inside and on the outside. Then if that's not bad enough he will get outworked as well by Pea who had a high workrate. Pac really has no chance in this fight and is at an extreme stylistic disadvantage here. The very thought of people picking Pac here is a combo of two things one overrating the hell out of Pac and not having a clue about styles and two not knowing how great a prime Sweet Pea Whitaker was who never really lost a fight in his prime.:deal
     
  8. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Yeah, in fact, I didn't see almost anybody putting any real stock in pascal.
     
  9. THIBB

    THIBB Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Sep 1, 2010

    call it what you want but i dont think picking sweet pea over pacman means I only pick black fighters. it means i pick the fighter with the most skills which is definatly sweet pea.
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,141
    Jun 23, 2005
    All this coming from one of the biggest PBF haters on ESB. Luke man you have some nerve and really don't have a leg to stand on here.:-(
     
  11. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Earlier today there was a Pac vs SRL thread and another thread saying that Manny is better than Duran. This one is just the least ludacris is all. Still though Manny barely could get by JMM. How the f#%k is Manny going to deal with a better boxer with arguably the best defense ever. You dumb ass *******s believe to much bull**** hype from beating shot fighters. How many technicians has Manny been matched against? He's never fought a slick,moving target and with good reason. He's only effective if someone exchanges with him. As soon as Cotto began backpeddling Manny had a coniption fit because he became far less effective. Against Clottey his magical angles couldn't do **** to open up Clottey and Clottey couldn't miss when he did decide to throw. In short Sweet Pea is stylistic nightmare to Manny who looks great but in all actuality is a one dimensional fighter.
     
  12. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    Whitaker in his prime took punches from lesser fighters than Pacquiao.

    Even in (what I think was) schooling Chavez, he got hit with leather, and chavez had mildly good foot work and hand speed.

    Pac could in and out just as fast as Pernell could duck and move.
     
  13. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    37,866
    45
    Jun 30, 2007
    I am one of the few 'haters' of floyd who picks him to beat Pac, because I remain objective about the fighters.

    That's the point i'm making.

    Yeah, I hate floyd, he's a trolling prize fighter who is snatching and grabbing... I don't like that quality in the best boxer.
     
  14. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,141
    Jun 23, 2005
    Since when did vcash become a measuring stick of boxing knowledge?:patsch I lost that vcash on the Froch-Kessler fight for your information. Yeah I picked Dawson to win but also backed up my pick with sound analysis not bull**** like Dawson by KO and that's it. Not to mention many others picked Dawson to win as he was the huge favorite in the fight.:deal
     
  15. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,141
    Jun 23, 2005
    Pac looked lost and followed Cotto around not cutting off the ring when Cotto used movement in the later rounds in their fight and was visiably frustrated by it. Pea Whitaker was hit by JCC but JCC's style was better suited to beat Pea than Pac's is and he still got schooled. Atleast JCC applied intelligent pressure could cut the ring off and fight on the inside as well as go to the body. A head hunter like Pac wouldn't have a snow balls chance in hell of beating Pea by head hunting and anyone who knows boxing will tell you this.:deal This is the sweet science the art of hitting at not getting hit Pea Whitaker damn near wrote the book and would absolutely school Pac like a teacher does a pupil it wouldn't be close.:deal