In their primes, who was more skilled... Lennox Lewis or Riddick Bowe?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by D.T, Oct 12, 2010.


  1. D.T

    D.T Guest

    Keep in mind Eddie Futch said Riddick Bowe had the most natural talent of anyone he ever trained, and he trained fighters like Joe Frazier, Larry Holmes and Ken Norton.
     
  2. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
  4. D.T

    D.T Guest

    Wow people don't know much about boxing.
     
  5. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    "Skills" are overrated. Riddick Bowe seemed to be able to do more overall, however Lewis was a far more intelligent fighter who boxed more consistently and executed better.
     
  6. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Lewis was the more sound of mind, obviously. Bowe was the more talented of the two, and I think that's quite obvious as well.
     
  7. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,311
    29,491
    Apr 4, 2005
    Bowe was a very aesthetically pleasing fighter to watch, with good punch technique and good variety of punches but Lewis was the more skillful boxer.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,179
    25,435
    Jan 3, 2007
    In the early 90's, I'm not so sure, but towards the middle of the decade, as Lewis developed under the instruction of Manny Steward, I think his skillset broadened to the point of surpassing Bowes. Riddick had a good infighting game, but his defense remained very unpolished. He also never learned to utilize his wingspan to the best of his advantage, by using the jab from a distance. I think Lewis improved in these areas and several others..
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    :good
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,799
    46,505
    Feb 11, 2005
    If by "skills", you mean the skills to acquire and defend the heavyweight championship, and duck no one, then Lewis.

    And for all of Bowe's infighting ability (which seemed to overawe many pundits) he had porous defense and a very often lazy jab. Still, I admit I thought he was the real thing and was surprised how quickly he declined.
     
  11. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    It's obvious to no end that 'skills' doesn't mean that.
     
  12. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    13
    Dec 2, 2008
  13. Kingkazim

    Kingkazim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,806
    12
    Aug 26, 2009
    this.
    If Bowe possessed a more, patient and disciplined mind, he would have excelled in the heavyweight division. Bowe was more skillful, but as they say, the mind> physical. And Lewis&Bowe demonstrate that perfectly
     
  14. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I'd say it's pretty even.

    Both are very skilful, in terms of their array of punches it's hard to split them, perhaps Bowe has the edge. In terms of defence, Lewis all day. Bowe was always way too hittable, Lennox possibly had slightly better footwork too.

    The main area where Lewis was superior was being able to use those skills as best he could, and he had the intelligence to take away some of what his opponent brought to the table.

    The only time I can really recall Lewis fighting how his opponent wanted for a prolonged spell was against Mercer. Against Holyfield II, Bruno and Klitschko he did for shorter periods.

    Bowe was aided against Holyfield in that when Evander got hit he always fired back, whereas he looked bad against the likes of Hide because he had to go looking for them.
     
  15. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Not the most eloquent saying, is it?