Which decade had the better B/C-grade lightweights?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010.


Page 1 of 3
  1. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Which decade do you think had the better B/C-list of lightweights?


    The lists I have bellow aren't ranked, just numbered.


    Which decade takes it iyo?


    Have I left any lightweights out who you think make a top 15?






    1980’s
    Excluded: Chavez, Whitaker, Arguello, Pryor, Camacho



    1. Jose Luis Ramirez
    2. Edwin Rosario
    3. Ray Mancini
    4. Freddie Pendleton
    5. Greg Haugen
    6. Roger Mayweather
    7. Frankie Randall
    8. Howard Davis Jr.
    9. Livingstone Bramble
    10. Robin Blake
    11. Jimmy Paul
    12. Vinny Pazienza
    13. Sean O’Grady
    14. Jim Watt
    15. Tony Baltazar



    1990s
    Excluded: DLH, Mosley, Whitaker


    1. Miguel Angel Gonzalez
    2. Rafael Ruelas
    3. Sharmba Mitchell
    4. Stevie Johnston
    5. Freddie Pendleton
    6. Orzubek Nazarov
    7. Jean Baptiste Mendy
    8. Phillip Holiday
    9. John John Molina
    10. Ivan Robinson
    11. Cesar Bazan
    12. Artur Grigorian
    13. Paul Spadafora
    14. Angel Manfredy
    15. Tony Lopez


    2000’s
    Excluded: Mayweather, Pacquiao


    1. Jose Luis Castillo
    2. Diego Corrales
    3. Juan Lazcano
    4. Joel Casamayor
    5. Acelino Freitas
    6. Juan Diaz
    7. Zahir Raheem
    8. Nate Campbell
    9. Michael Katsidis
    10. Nate Campbell
    11. Juan Manuel Marquez (he is an A grade fighter, but not an A grade lightweight)
    12. Artur Grigorian
    13. Javier Jauregui
    14. Julio Diaz
    15. Leonard Dorin
     
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    #1
  2. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    There pretty much in order good to worse. I think the 90's and 2000s are debateable if anything but the 80s are the best.
     
    lefthook31, Oct 14, 2010
    lefthook31, Oct 14, 2010
    #2
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,898
    47,889
    Mar 21, 2007
    I like your lists.


    I think the 80's. The way i'm looking at it is, which list would you least like to see a prospect from your hometown try to break into, and I think the 80's would be toughest, then the 00's, then the 90's. I won't argue with anyone who wants to swap 00's and 90's, but yeah, 80's.

    Nice thread.
     
    McGrain, Oct 14, 2010
    McGrain, Oct 14, 2010
    #3
  4. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I think the 80's has a pretty good mix-up of styles along with a solid level of comp.
    The top ten are pretty solid all around, though.
     
    Swarmer, Oct 14, 2010
    Swarmer, Oct 14, 2010
    #4
  5. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    It's between the 80s and 90s.

    Overall i'd go for the 80s, but the likes of Nazarov, Johnston and Grigorian push it close.

    the 00s is a mostly tepid group.
     
    lora, Oct 14, 2010
    lora, Oct 14, 2010
    #5
  6. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    **** I've got Nate Campbell twice. Anyone think of a fitting replacement?
     
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    #6
  7. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    How about Roberto Garcia
     
    lefthook31, Oct 14, 2010
    lefthook31, Oct 14, 2010
    #7
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,898
    47,889
    Mar 21, 2007

    Nate Campbell is so cool you can have him twice.


    How about Manfredy?
     
    McGrain, Oct 14, 2010
    McGrain, Oct 14, 2010
    #8
  9. lefthook31

    lefthook31 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,862
    138
    Jul 6, 2007
    I see Molina is there
     
    lefthook31, Oct 14, 2010
    lefthook31, Oct 14, 2010
    #9
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Looks like 80's is the consensus.

    Cheers. Yeah the 80's would be pretty tough to crack. There's quite a few other guys that could be mentioned there that didn't make the cut that are decent.

    A pretty even bunch I'd say.

    I never would have thought it without having the list in front of me, but I agree, the 90's don't shape up that bad. I used to think the 90's were pretty empty but then the 00's came along and made me reminisce about the 90's.

    Yeah Manfredy will do :good
     
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    #10
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    267
    Jul 22, 2004
    Perhaps but clearly above Diaz, Katsidis and probably Casamayor. Guzman didn't do much at the weight but was immensely talented
     
    PowerPuncher, Oct 14, 2010
    PowerPuncher, Oct 14, 2010
    #11
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    267
    Jul 22, 2004
    Guzman
     
    PowerPuncher, Oct 14, 2010
    PowerPuncher, Oct 14, 2010
    #12
  13. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Hence the B AND C classifications :good

    Do you think Guzman could beat some of the other lightweights in the 00's list?
     
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    sweet_scientist, Oct 14, 2010
    #13
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,898
    47,889
    Mar 21, 2007


    That mother****er only made the weight three times, and one of those was by mistake :lol: **** him.
     
    McGrain, Oct 14, 2010
    McGrain, Oct 14, 2010
    #14
  15. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Apparently he has some ****ed up metabolic disease, which is supposedly the reason for his recent inactivity.
     
    Swarmer, Oct 14, 2010
    Swarmer, Oct 14, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 3