Should fighters have a "not right" clause in a contract?

I have wondered about this for a while. If a guy wins or loses because either men are not right, should there be a specific clause that is a given unless agreed otherwise?

 

Think of it.

We would not have had to discuss Buster and Tyson.

Surely this would help the Mental Health of Boxing fans as a whole.

 

Wtf?

 

It is only invoked when a guy is not right.

Hatton never looked that bad before.

Thus, it would be used here for a rematch with Pac.

 

ok like someone having a baD night? maybe in the future when they make machines that test your boDy out like some fight science stuff.

 

It will be a long time before we have that technology.

 

Yeah like something that measures emotion anD energy levels reflexes anD a whole bunch of stuff.

 

We can measure emotion now.

It will not be long until we do it more accurately.

 

That's not right!

 

You mean like McCall?

The problem is that people would fake it. As soon as the other guy gets the better of them, they would just drop their pants and start jacking off in the middle of the ring. Claim insanity and get a no contest.

 

They would have to go to Court then.

 

No

 

Pity.

Wlad was not right against Sandars.

 

He did not train and that was his fault, not to mention his trainer and Klaus Peter Kohl. However, the investigation over the Brewster drugging should never have been stopped.

 

Are you sure? I heard he had an argument with a girlfriend and it upset him.

Not his fault.