Are you serious with the Robinson/Walker analogy lol...!!!??? Second, I don't rank great fighters over atg fighters while that great fighter is still fighting. PAc is great, Pea is an atg. It's disresepctful to rank Pac over Pea when PAc is still fighting...
Mickey Walker was the ****. If I had to pick a #4 greatest WW it would easily be him. He beat some great guys at LW-HW in a pretty stacked era. For a guy like him to score a close decision with someone like Loughran is astounding. The analogy might be a little silly, but the point is valid. I just think Pac's career is more impressive than Pea's right now, if only because the range of weights he has excelled at is ridiculous. Might not be a bad idea to wait and see until a couple years after he's retired, but it's still incredible nonetheless.
Really....me n him was debating about Froch not too long ago..Pimp like Froch and I don't.. Luke if you can't see the difference between a "*******" and a "*****" than you trippin with all due respect cuz u good poster... just saying..IS IT REALLY NOT CLEAR TO YOU THAT *******S NEVER ATTEMPT TO ENGAGE IN ARGUMENTS THAT MIGHT EXPOSE WHAT THERE SAYING? U DONT SEE THAT THEY LITERALLY IGNORE EVERY LOGICAL POST WITH A GOOD ARGUMENT PUT UP IN FRONT OF IT... THEY ALWAYS RUN OUT OF THREADS..AT LEAST "*****S" STAY UP WITH BOXING AND NOT JUST GOING ON AROUND MANNY PAC MAN...I KNOW U NEITHER A FLOYD NOR PAC FAN..NOT REALLY SURE WHO U LIKE...RJJ FROM WHAT I SEEN U POST... WHEN U GOT POSTERS LIKE LANCE ARMSTRONG SAYING "U PUT THE SAME ARGUMENT UP EVERYTIME SDS" AND I'M RESPONDING WITH "CUZ MY ARGUMENT DOESN'T CHANGE TO FIT NEW INFO" AND HE RESPONS "CUZ UR A FUKIN IDIOT" THAT DONT SHOW U THAT THEY DONT WANNA ATTEMPT TO GET IN A LOGICAL DEBATE AND WOULD RATHER JUST TROLL ESB TALKIN ABOUT WHY FLOYD IS ON VACATION WHEN ASKED WHO WOULD WIN IN A FIGHT? SO AGAIN...AT LEAST "*****S" FOLLOW THE ENTIRE SPORT..NOT JUST PACQUIAO AND WHAT GOES ON AROUND HIMthumbsup
I just don't rank fighters who are still fighting over retired greats. People did this with Mike Tyson back then, and it was silly then also...
The one thing that gets lost in all of this is that Pea didn't care if you had power...he followed his game plan. He fought strong punchers in their prime in Azumah Nelson, Dlh, Tito, Chavez, Vasquez, McGirt, Pineda, Ramirez, and was not ever close to being ko'd.
Funny how *******s get owned all the time with boxing history and technical boxing..all the fukin dummiez know is pac..
Pernell whitaker wins! Happy? What is the point of these threads? Nobody is right or wrong anyway. Fights are won on top of the ring. It is not based on perceived skills over other fighter's perceived skills. Otherwise, what is the point of fighting. You just read the writers breakdown of the fighter's skills before each fight and then award the belt to whoever wins based on perception. That solves this debate. Let me put this scenario : 12th round : Pernell whitaker was winning every second of the fight, as like the rest of the 11 rounds then all of a sudden, Pac connected to the chin and Whitaker is down to the count. Can you prove me wrong or right?
That's a dumb thinking!!! Pac already achieved accomplishment no other Fighter in history had!! He already got the record of 7 weight classes and 4 Lineal titles. So u mean you cant rate Pac higher than Ellorde coz Pac's still fighting? ESB please... get rid of these dumb asses here and Bring back Pacd, KG, acb, brooklyn, esboxer, dmingo, etc. those were the real boxing minds.
Blah blah blah blah blah. I already told whoupicking why Dawson will never be as he was insistent that you have to watch Dawson in order to be an "expert". He is a wannabe Fraud (who is also a wannabe SRL) with lesser power.
My only problem with sweetpea is that Im not sure he has the power to keep manny honest. I see sweetpea starting off well , but being beaten in a close but clear decision. Manny would have to walk through quite a few jabs early on , but his punch output sees him through in a classic.