Proof! MANNY PACQUIAO NEVER WON 7 WORLD TITLES IN 7 DIVISIONS

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Karceno, Oct 16, 2010.

Page 2 of 10
  1. sandy mac

    sandy mac Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2008
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    0
    pabeat Cotto at a catchweight. Not at welterweight!!!
     
    sandy mac, Oct 16, 2010
    #16
  2. bambamz

    bambamz Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,068
    Likes Received:
    0
    haven't watched the vid nor will ever

    but lemme just say your a dumbass

    :good
     
    bambamz, Oct 16, 2010
    #17
  3. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Messages:
    18,163
    Likes Received:
    2
    pejevan, Oct 16, 2010
    #18
  4. Tora

    Tora Guest

    **** off with the *****s and the *******s its boring now!
     
    Tora, Oct 16, 2010
    #19
  5. Keueng

    Keueng Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,304
    Likes Received:
    1
    If what you say is true, then he is only 5 division, because at LWW he only won the ring belt from Ricky Hatton (and the not regarded IBO or... WBF or WBU whatever belt :lol:)
     
    Keueng, Oct 16, 2010
    #20
  6. mozart

    mozart New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2010
    Messages:
    92
    Likes Received:
    0
    crap...
     
    mozart, Oct 16, 2010
    #21
  7. slo100

    slo100 Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2007
    Messages:
    1,712
    Likes Received:
    0
    slo100, Oct 16, 2010
    #22
  8. Chunk

    Chunk tallaght boy Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2007
    Messages:
    1,070
    Likes Received:
    0
    its about who you fought and when you fought them.....not about titles! I cudnt give a **** what belts in what weight classes he has! I just wanna look at the quality of opponent he faces and how he does in them fights.......so far pacman has been brilliant in that regard
     
    Chunk, Oct 16, 2010
    #23
  9. pejevan

    pejevan inmate No. 1363917 Full Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2006
    Messages:
    18,163
    Likes Received:
    2
    That is why *****s are stupid.

    They think legacies are built on the money you make, PPV's you get, belts you nhold.

    Who ****ing cares about these numbers anyway?
     
    pejevan, Oct 16, 2010
    #24
  10. MancMexican

    MancMexican Blood & Guts Forever Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    Messages:
    5,152
    Likes Received:
    0
    Welterweight is 141-147 pounds you ****. 147 is the Welterweight LIMIT, not the minimum. You remember hearing the announcers say stuff like 'he weighed just under the LIMIT.'
     
    MancMexican, Oct 16, 2010
    #25
  11. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Being 4 weight lineal / 3 weight Ring World champion is a better acheivement than 6 time ABC titlist!
     
    Clarkson, Oct 16, 2010
    #26
  12. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly 141-147 is welterweight, not 141-145 which is where Pac and Cotto fought!
     
    Clarkson, Oct 16, 2010
    #27
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    41,814
    Likes Received:
    5
    145 is within welter. so like it or not, it is a legal weight limit for the ABCs to sanction their welter titles. but as it is, beating cotto at 145 is a much better achievement in itself than claiming the welter ABC title.
     
    puga_ni_nana, Oct 16, 2010
    #28
  14. Clarkson

    Clarkson Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,703
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree that beating Cotto at 145 is better than winning a WW ABC.

    I just think all title fights should allow both fighters to weigh in at the limit if they chose to, and not allow a limit within a limit!
     
    Clarkson, Oct 16, 2010
    #29
  15. alvinorat

    alvinorat Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    are you that stupid not to understand that its "WITHIN" the welterweight limit!!!! WITHIN!!!! so what what weight class is 141 to 145 huh Einstien?
     
    alvinorat, Oct 16, 2010
    #30
Page 2 of 10