McVey and Mendoza going mental again

:rofl

Pwned again I see.

 

Like that nonsense about Johnson being knocked down by Langford, and his fight with Battling Jim being scheduled for 20rds?

Both of which you repeat interminably, even though you know them to be false.
Poor sources do not take on a life of their own they are propagated by agenda driven bigots like you.

 

Very interesting. Do you know if he said anything referring to Martin?

 

I love how he is repeatedly asked to provide the quote , obliges several times yet, it is ignored and , not accepted by the poster who requested it in the first place.atsch

 

The Munroe fight was a financial disappointment ,because it was an obvious mismatch ,that is why the public did not attend in any number.

As has been shown here Jeffries was offered $20,000 to fight Sam McVey in 1903 , he turned it down, for fear of losing to a black man.
l

 

Even allowing for the possibility of multiple typo errors I have found 24 further fights for Johnson in his early career , including 2 in 1895.

Your research should help confirm Johnson's status, during Jeffries reign, and establish just why Jeffries quit so early.

I must say you have started very promisingly with this subject.:good

 

McCunt,

The Cyberboixng zone says it was a 20 round match. They do excellent research there. Take up your agenda with them. I posted the fight report here. Its clear Jim got the better.

 

You found them? HA! More like I showed it to you when you said Johnson did not have many fights when he meet Choynski. Stop lying!

So says the man who claims a 139 IQ who always roots for the better man to win.

 

Mismatch because Jeffries KO's his men. Johnson took an out of shape Munroe the distance. Mcvey was an unknown back in 1903. He was not nearly as famous as Corbett.

As champion Jeffries did fight a 4 rounder with Griffin, who was black. Jeffries floored Griffin multiple times. Jack Johnson lost to Griffin, and could not defeat him in three tries.

 

I FOUND THEM ,SOURCE, "IN THE RING AND OUT", its on my desk as I write.Do you want me to list their names you cretin?

ps. My IQ, [when tested was 135, not 139],I have spoken to a couple of lecturers about I Q tests, and they put little stock in them, and neither do I ,I stated my I Q in response to one of your puerile comments.
For the record I consider myself of no more than average intelligence.











Which of course ,puts me several leagues above a ****** like yourself.:thumbsup

 

So Jeffries was willing to meet Jack Munroe who had won 8 fights out of 13,and meet him for peanuts.Yet wouldn't face Sam McVey , for $20,000 ?

A McVey who had gone 20rds with Jack Johnson ,and kod Fred Russell in his 7 fights.

Jeffries refused to meet McVey in August 1903, two months after that ,McVey went another 20rds with Johnson and, though he was floored twice put up a great fight, he also kod Denver Ed Martin in 2 rds, and Kid Carter, prior to his second fight with Johnson.

Are you seriously telling us that Munroe was a better opponent, both financially, and fistically than Sam Mcvey?
In 1904 Johnson dominated Mcvey over 20rds before koing him, which begs the question why didnt Jeffries fight Johnson instead of Munroe in 1904 ?

You must think we are as stupid as you.

 

Mendoza, are you now satisfied that Jeffries ducked Johnson on the basis of his skin colour? And that a case can be made that he ducked McVey and possibly Martin as well?

 

A newspaper heading of the TEN ROUND FIGHT was shown on this forum,everyone saw it even you,stop embarrassing yourself you moron.

 

If you think you are going to get an admission from Jeffries chief " blow job" , you are seriously optimistic.

 

Mismatch, because Munroe did not deserve a title shot in the first place.Similar to Jack Finnegan another undeserving challenger, who had been kod in 4rds by Ruhlin, just 3 months before fighting Jeffries, being floored 8 times in the one -sided farce.