Archie Moore's views on the best fighters around/of all time

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GPater11093, Oct 18, 2010.


  1. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Again, I recently bought and am reading Archie Moore's auto biography and in it he mentions some of his favourites, or the best fighters he has seen.

    Thought it was interesting reading, especially as Moore was a bit of a gym rat around the 40's and 50's so would have a good inside view.

    When asked about his favourite fighters by fans Archie has this to say:

    'I never saw Joe Gans, but from what I've read and heard I'd say my all time great was the Old Master.

    'Joe Louis is the best Heavyweight I've seen in action. Book was published in 1960, so Ali was not around, does anyone know what Archie thought of Ali? John Henry Lewis was the best Light Heavyweight, but if anyone wants to dispute that and throw my name in, I'll listen to the discussion with rapt attention. The best Middleweight was Sugar Ray Robinson, the best Welterweight was Charlie Brady (is this a mistype? Should it read Burley?) Ike Williams is my pick for the best Lightweight; bantamweight, Harold Dade; and Flyweight Earl Perez.

    'There are four more fighters I would like to mention. Two of them, Barney Ross and Fritzi (sp) Zivic, belong on anybody's list of greats. And at the top of my own list, the top, mind you, I put Henry Armstrong. My last favrouite is Sandy Saddler. I rate Sandy as one of the greatest punchers I ever saw, but if I had handled Sandy at the beginning I would have changed his style. I would have made him hard to hit by teaching him to use that fantastically long reach. They would never have hit him, and with his punch he would have become the greatest of them all.'

    Interesting selection of fighters, I'm sure you will agree.

    Firstly, i think it has a predominately black feel, which would have been slightly at odds with experts of the day IMO. But it also shows how highly regarded guys like John Henry Lewis was regarded.

    Secondly, there is two names (three if you include Brady) that are almost unknown to me: Dade and Perez. (Although I have just did a quick search and can't find any fighter called Earl Perez so I will assume it is Pascual Perez. Ditto for Brady, I assume its Burley.) Well anyway Dade to me is a fighter that I often use as a 'mark against' Manuel Ortiz, but it seems he was a highly regarded fighter, anyone shed any info on him?

    Thirdly, as soon as I read it, I just thought what a match up is Moore vs Lewis. How do you see it going? Lewis to me, actually reminds me a bit of Harold Johnson but with a bit more lateral movement and more fluid counter-punching style.
     
  2. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
  3. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Also I missed out, what do you guys think on Moore's views on changing Saddler's style? It sounds disastrous to me.

    Glad you liked it Teeto.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,076
    12,989
    Jan 4, 2008
    This is what he says in Hauser's book: "Ali would have beaten Joe Louis four times out of five."
     
  5. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    I'd liken Lewis to Johnson as well from what I've seen. Both very fundamentally sound boxer-punchers. Given that I'd have to favor Moore at his best.

    I'm just as stumped as you are on Earl Perez and Charlie Brady, though.

    As for Dade, he wasn't too highly thought of prior to giving Ortiz the pasting he did in their matchup, from what I know, despite a fine record up to that point. It should be noted, though, that what would've been the prime days of his career were interrupted by a 3 year stint in the Marines. During that time it's likely he could've made the name for himself that he failed to prior to his bout with Ortiz. He could very well have been among the most highly regarded of Bantamweight champions without this halt to his progress. He was apparently a whirlwind of a fighter for a short time.
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    :good on all points
     
  7. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Thanks.

    He probably would have ranked Ali number 1 then.

    I have always though of Lewis as a bigger, better Juan Manuel Marquez. I would also favour Moore but I think Lewis's more dynamic countering could give him some added problems.

    I think it is Pascual Perez and Charley Burley. I would say that he never really mentioned Burley in his book, or the other 'Murderer's' which I find very surprising. And to think if it is Charley Burley it is a bit disrespectful getting his name wrong. Either that or this guy has a secret admirer - http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=64008&cat=boxer

    I reckon it was ghost written by a non-boxing writer and Moore did not check over it. Hence why Burley was misspelt.

    Thanks for this.

    How highly do you think of Ortiz's revenge win? Surely, even if Dade didn't join the Marines, Ortiz would still be the hard obstacle to overcome, do you think he could have toppled Ortiz earlier and reigned longer?

    Also Dade was a West Coast fighter, I'm thinking Moore has some inside/gym knowledge of him.
     
  8. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    moore always said burley gave him the worst beating of his life, didnt he ?...he was in hospital for days afterwards...and was complimentary about burley afterwards too...so, that all fits.
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Whenever you read about Moore, he is normally very complimentary to the Row. The Row isn't mentioned in the book, I think its been written to appeal to the mainstream, but it is still interesting.
     
  10. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    It's impossible to say whether Dade could've been better than Ortiz, although I doubt it. What I do know is that Ortiz himself was thought of as a highly inconsistent performer. Hardly the most dedicated to his craft at the best of times, although when he was on his A game there have been few to match him. I generally think of this loss (among others) as a victim of Ortiz's own negligence in the gym.

    That sounds likely, although my limited knowledge on the matter couldn't conclude it.
     
  11. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    That is the feeling I get from the bout, that Ortiz was under prepared and that Dade may have fought the fight of his life. I, although not many do, think that Ortiz looks superb on film, so I do think it would be hard to imagine Dade being better.

    There is not really much on Dade at all really, is there?

    That was my first impression was that Dade impressed Archie in the gyms.
     
  12. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    347
    Jul 13, 2007
    Seconded. thanks for posting. Very interesting.
     
  13. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    288
    Apr 18, 2007
    Archie was insistent that he did not use a ghost writer, but at the least he should have used a proof reader, if not also doing that himself.

    I do have multiple different editions of certain books, and they can vary significantly in substantial typographical errors. I have one edition of Walden where the writer mentions "muscles" living in the pond, but an earlier edition where "mussels" is correctly used. Thoreau wasn't stupid, and surviving scripts written in his hand make it clear that he knew how to spell mussels properly, meaning the publisher, typesetters and proof readers of the later edition sucked. (When Bernard Montgomery published his memoirs, he made an explicit point of expressing that he wrote out every single word of it himself in longhand, just as Ulysses S. Grant had done in the 1880s.)
     
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    Duodenum, I have the first edition GB version it appears.
     
  15. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    14,214
    80
    Apr 1, 2008
    whats the book called exactly greg ?...
    i can see a biography on amazon, but not an autobiography..