Do you agree the klit bros are top 10 heavyweights of all time??

with two wins over holyfield, that makes it better than wlads.

 

brewster disposed of golota faster than lewis ?

when lewis did it, golota was in his prime. when brewster did it, he was way past prime. the stuff you write makes me laugh.

 

i gave up shining shoes a long time ago. sorry.

 

He doesn't. I rate him for what he was - A tremendously talented figter. He had more skill than either Klitschko and, yeah, he didn't achieve as much as he could have done but at his best, he was an excellent fighter.

 

it helps his standing a bit. but not much. he beat moorer and a couple of mediocre fighters. he lost to the rest.

 

It's ridiculous. He knocked him out 40 seconds later...what a **** fighter Lewis was. Brewster is OBVIOUSLY the better fighter.

 

I'd wait for the brothers to retire and finish there boxing careers.
but if I were to put them right now? it be out side the top 10 but not too far away

 

coming back to win the undisputed hw title in a deep division at 40 in and some change only helps your resume a little?

you are ridiculous

 

they are great because they're the first brothers in history to hold portions of the HW title at the same time ? :rofl:rofl

please keep writing, you amuse me.

 

Please correct me if i am wrong but are you suggesting Brewster is better than Lewis?

 

i said it added to his legacy you moron. but beating moorer didn't make him the ATG he is today.

 

I never said Brewster was a better fighter than Lewis. :nono Learn to ****in' read................

 

Winning the title again helps. His age is irrelevant.

 

Read above post, and re-read the original. I'm at work & it's hard to argue with 4 people at once................I merely said I didn't think Lamon was a mediocre fighter.

 

So wining a belt when you're 20 something is the same as 40 something? Yeah, okay.................................. :roll: