There's NO REHYDRATION CLAUSE, says Arum...!!!

i think i feel a ***** joke coming

this is the problem with going against pacman or mayweather on a topic!
you straight away get branded one or the other

i like pac but hate arum:thumbsup

 

Indeed bro and those clowns(*****s) that are always mentioning compubox stats after every one of his fights to try and make him look more dominant than he was in some fights are the same clowns that say compubox is pointless and irrelevant when it shows Floyd being second best like it happened in the first Castillo fight, typical bull**** from clowns that can only see things in favor of the man they love.

 

That sounds a lot like Floyd.

 

Wow...still playing that old song after 20 years... It's a good thing none of your faves EVERY lie right? Lucky you! :good

 

if mayweather was to fight and defeat pac who is naturally the smaller man would that win mean something???? of course it would

so a win against JMM matters too:good

 

The way it is I guess.

I don't like Arum, but I don't assume everything he says is a lie, because for the most part, if they were, we'd know, not be arguing whether a specific item is a lie or not.

 

Ok... Me being a ***** made you bring him up on this thread. :good

 

Yeah cause its exactly the same situation atschatsch

 

atsch WTF?!?! You cannot make blanket statements like that. That's is NOT how boxing works.

Answer me this:

1. Pac or JMM, who has had success at 140 and above.

2. Pac or JMM, who has had NO SUCCESS in fight at 140 and above.

Oh **** it, I'll answer for you.
1. Pac
2. JMM

So HOW is it the same if they have not had the same success in higher weights?

 

When its something that favors Floyd then Arum is the most credible source in the world when it doesnt hes the biggest liar in the history of the sport and maybe in the history of the world, thats ***** logic for you.

 

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8004273&postcount=85

FYI...don't run off!

 

why isnt it??? a pacman victory would mean more for floyds legacy than a victory over JMM but it dsnt make a victory over JMM meaningless!

thats all im saying

 

You're gonna have to share your knowledge and break this down for me as well. Why are you posting this? To show that you bring up Floyd in threads that have nothing to do with him as well just to talk ****?

 

Because out of Pac and JMM., ONLY PAC has proven he can fight at the heavier weights. See how that works?

How the heck does a boxing fan not take that into consideration? :huh

 

read my reply above mate!