There's NO REHYDRATION CLAUSE, says Arum...!!!

I knew it. I was hoping you'd address in the thread it originated, but you obviously decided not to. Typoical for a COWARD!! :yep

 

2 year lay-off....that levels the playing field:good

 

No, the same weight levels the playing field. atsch

But I will say this, thank you for displaying some of thew worst logic a so-called boxing fan can produce.

 

then he fought mosley...38 but a full fledged welter

 

Arum is a liar but it doesn't mean that he's lying about there being no rehydration clause. Until any real credible source comes forward and confirms this rumor, there's no reason for me to entertain what reeks of being a smear campaign.

 

because i dont agree with you im wrong????:huh

i still say it was a decent win after a long lay-off and i truly believe hes got one or two huge victories left in him

but i suppose someone will always have a reason to dis-credit any opponent he beats...."old"..."too green"...."too small"...etc

 

:huh I replied in that thread before you even posted it in this thread? More insults thrown and no real debate... :good

 

Pac is better suited at this higher weight than Marquez is, not all fighters can move up and carry their attributes with them which is why not many have success when they do...
Try using some sort of brain if there is one in there somewhere.

 

ooh fighting words from the arm-chair warrior:bbb
i dont get involved with your type i only respect people who talk like that to my face:good

maybe you should have been taught some manners growing up!
feel free to reply when your willing to have an adult conversation:hi:

 

also remember we didnt know how JMM would handle the weight before the fight!

we didnt know before pacman jumped up either

we do now!

 

Hell no, you're logic is terrible for the simple reason, it's terrible. Has nothing to do with me agreeing or disagreeing.

It was a gimme win. Nothing more then a glorified tune up. Added to the fact that Floyd didn't even try to make weight made it even more a mockery.

 

WTF is this supposed to mean? Actually, if you read a lot of reports before the JMM fight, most said he was too small. And that was with the 144 limit they BOTH agreed on.

Have no idea what point you think you've made, but fact of the matter is, Pac showed he can complete above 135. JMM has not.

 

Lets not pretend your hurt feelings are what's keeping you from replying to bazooka. Hurt feeling? Really?

He shot down your argument plain and simple. At least bre man enough to admit you were wrong.

 

You answered perfectly clear. You're a piece of **** who cheers for guys who beat women. It's that simple! Just embrace it dude...it's who you are. deal

 

if you read a lot of reports before the PAC/DLH fight they said the same thing

pac got his shot at a higher weight and took it and proved he can fight there

JMM got his shot and failed....that dsnt mean mayweather giving him his opportunity and beating him is meaningless!

remember the meaningless part is what ive been arguing!!!