The argument that American Heavies are "in other sports"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Cachibatches, Oct 20, 2010.


  1. Talivar

    Talivar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    In your analogy they all been playing football and would have destroyed anyone if they hadnt been?
     
  2. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    these kinds of comments discredit anything factual you may have previously said


    :-(
     
  3. Check_Hook

    Check_Hook Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,478
    3
    Jul 23, 2010
    They have produced the greatest SMW of all time.

    Are you forgetting that America is 20 times the size of GB.
     
  4. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Both are Argentinian, not from the UK.

    You mean Football. Football does not require athleticism? :huh

    Football and boxing are completely different, the same way basketball and boxing are completely different, NFL and boxing " ".

    So me making statement that football is taking all our middleweight champions, is about as valid as you making the statement that Basketball and the NFL is taking the potential boxing stars.

    America made the Heavyweight division what it is. I agree with with the first 3 questions...but then come the excuses...It is no longer top of it's game because they can't find anyone to come close to beating the top Heavyweight's today.

    What would the excuse be if America dominated a lower division (out of range of Basketball and NFL) for 100 years, but then hit a slump...and Europe, Mexico, etc took over?
     
  5. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
  6. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    There's a huge difference between being a good athlete and being a fighter. Most of these strong, fast NFL players couldn't cut it in boxing. There's always been people like that but they aren't ever going to be world class fighters.

    What turns good athletes into good fighters? Probably their background and desperation. American fighters have gone soft - America doesn't produce warriors any more. Even though there are still lots of American boxers, their mentality has changed. The days of the Philly fighter are done. There will be no more Joe Frazier's or Bennie Briscoe's.

    And not one American great could cut it in another sport. Ali, Frazier, Tyson etc., wouldn't ever be good at another sport.
     
  7. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    3
    Jan 6, 2009
    you are owning yourself with this comment
     
  8. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Bob Fitzsimmons, Randy Turpin and Joe Calzaghe.
     
  9. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    Exactly...these big, strong, powerful guys that are being brought up as the guys moving to "other sports", and potential champions if they hadn't...most likely have had some experience with boxing training. Yet they chose another sport.

    I could be 6'8, 240lbs, very athletic, I might be able to jump over a 7ft man...but it doesn't mean I would be successful at boxing.
     
  10. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    whats atg go to to do with it? we have produced champions consistently over the past 20 years at mw/smw, the usa have failed to do this at hw, why is that?

    all our 160-180lb'ers are playing football
     
  11. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    The focus on being able to jump over a 7ft man is quite odd. I don't know why it would ever be mentioned. Nobody is doubting that these people are great athletes, but it's just this assumption that they could make it as a because because they can jump.

    Most top boxers weren't great athletes. Ali wasn't particularly strong, Frazier wasn't agile, Tyson was limited because of his physical size, Louis didn't have fast feet - They weren't exceptional athletes, but they were all born a fighter.

    Countless trainers over the years have been given these supposed tough, strong, athletic men and said that it's not enough. It just isn't. I don't care how fast someone is or how strong they are, when they get hit, it's another story. A fighter has to be tough and resilient and I don't think American's are any more.

    The emphasis on this thread is about heavyweights, which suits the argument because the NFL is full of 250lb men and the NBA is full of 6'5"+ athletes. Where's the explanation for the lack of American -200lbers? The depth isn't much different.
     
  12. AnthonyW

    AnthonyW ESB Official Gif Poster Full Member

    2,732
    21
    Dec 22, 2009
    :good

    There may be some guys in basketball and the NFL who had the potential to be champion boxers. But using that as the sole reason why America hasn't produced any good Heavyweight's over the last couple years is an excuse. The main reason is that most Heavyweights aren't up to standard, not just America...but most countries.
     
  13. Cachibatches

    Cachibatches Boxing Junkie banned

    10,261
    12
    Nov 12, 2006
    There is absolutley nothing indicating that these men have the stamina, chin, or other specialized skills to make a good fighter.

    But it is irrelevent. look at the numbers.
     
  14. USboxer1981

    USboxer1981 The Real Def. MVP Full Member

    9,873
    2
    Nov 9, 2007

    They need pads because they hit about 100 times harder and come in way faster than Rugby hits.

    I like Rugby, but watch a rugby game then immediately turn to an NFL game... THe speed difference is appalling ... speed kills
     
  15. NeckBreaknAiken

    NeckBreaknAiken Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,014
    4
    Jul 30, 2008
    :lol::lol:

    :deal