The Theory of "Modern Training Methods" Being Superior

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Oct 20, 2010.


  1. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Part of the reason that post is so frustrated is that the article i posted about the potential for weights and strength training in a fighter's routine got ignored completely. Really, it's good stuff. It strikes a middle ground between a bunch of the viewpoints in this topic. Strength training with weights CAN be beneficial to a fighter's training routine, when designed properly. But that same article also admits that calisthenics and strongman work can produce similar results.

    It also shows the difference in training for different KINDS of strength, which is certainly relevant to the discussion. I find this whole strength training debate to be silly anyway since fighters should be spending more time training for speed, endurance, and sports-specific skill. And you see the best fighters doing that. Look at Pacquiao's workouts in baguio, he does some calisthenics and isometric drills with ariza, spars and does rounds of spar, bag and pad work, and then cross trains in basketball for fun. How is that so absurdly different or more effective than other fighters routines in the past?


    I'm not saying sports science is irrelevant to boxing or to the discussion. Supplements/Nutrition and greater understanding of CNS and muscular interaction will always be relevant to athletic development. My point is that those advances are not making for specifically better boxers or boxing. With greater emphasis on conditioning we have seen a drop in sports-specific teaching(skills, strategy) and endurance training. That's why the klits can 1-2 their opponents in the face for 12 rounds and their opponent can't figure out what to do. That's why David Haye gasses in the first 3 rounds throwing haymakers and then drops his WR to something pathetic. It's why Chad Dawson backs people up to the ropes with 7-punch combinations and then starts daydreaming about tits and weed.

    :lol:
     
  2. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    You´ve got a fan here. :good
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,985
    48,062
    Mar 21, 2007
    And he generally looked slightly less impressive, slightly less explosive. If you want to see Tyson at his most explosive, look at the version that trained sans-weights (for the most part).


    Less explosive again, certainly not more.

    I think they are getting something along the lines of what's already been discussed in this thread. Replacement for other excersises that makes them neither more, nor less explosive in my opinion (done right).

    Supplements are just food, for the most part. In essence, it allows the body to take on maximum nutrition for minimum calories. This has translated into huge advantages in weight-making, not explosivity.



    They would; but not as much as those that are specific to advantages in boxing. I, and some of the most explosive boxers in history, feel this is best achieved without weights, or just as well with weights, not to a greater degree with weights.

    Basically there's no evidence in existane that weights make fighters better. If you believe this you are making up your mind of it independent of any actual evidence.

    You mention practicing technique specifically, but seem to have ignored that fighters spar and fight less. I can't think of a better way to improve technique, and nor can you. Nor can any modern trainer.


    Wasn't there? I see no evidence at all that Carnera had worse stamina than Wlad. He certainly never suffered any such embarrassing collapses or did anything remotely comparable to Willard's title winning effort in terms of endruance and stamina. Wlad has far, far more speed and power, but this is as much to do with vastly improved technique as anything else. As much, mark you.



    I see no improvements in any of the areas you've mentioned. I see improvements in weight-making, and arguably related areas that might impact related perfromance.

    Again, i'd invite you to produce a shread of evidence that any of this makes better boxers. Not the same - better.


    Nobody does, from your side of the argument. There's just so little actual evidence to present. Basically it boils down to the minimal amount of weight-training that Tyson did being the secret to his explosiveness, or exaggerating the amount of weight training that he did do.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,985
    48,062
    Mar 21, 2007
    I disagree. It was hard for him to get the balance right, in gaining as much weight as he was. He made the best of a bad lot.

    You are talking about highly specialised weight-specific excersises. I am talking about a multi-faceted athlete marrying explosiveness to boxing technique. Basically we are talking about two totally different things.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,985
    48,062
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,138
    13,093
    Jan 4, 2008
    I've read it now. Very interesting.:good
     
  7. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Maintaining speed and endurance while bulking is definitely difficult. A clean bulk is a ***** to get right, Holyfield is one of the best examples i've seen(lol PEDS) and even Pacquiao and Adamek recently have managed to do a solid job but look at all the other versions of bulked up fighters that just look awful, chambers being a great example. He'd probably be a solid CW. Haye at heavyweight is largely unimpressive despite having gained what looks to be mostly muscly bulk.

    I think this is part of the reason why Heavies in the past trained down, and lighter fighters moving up divisions didn't really try and bulk up that much. They were willing to sacrifice weight for dexterity, speed, and endurance. And it certainly worked for them, right?

    It's all a matter of perspective. There are plenty of different ways to achieve athletic goals. Just because our understanding of strength and physiology is greater doesn't mean that it's being applied to it's full extent in sports. It also doesn't mean that athletes and persons from previous eras didn't have very developed strength and speed. Athleticism and raw physicality are only one part of the game anyway. Fitzsimmons would burn the **** out of Corbett in sprints. But who was faster in the ring? And who applied it better?
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,985
    48,062
    Mar 21, 2007
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,138
    13,093
    Jan 4, 2008
    I can just add that my own (short) experience of supplements is very positive. I used one supplement (Synerlin) to lose weight and one (Whey) to recuperate quicker between training sessions. Both worked very well.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    No we are not talking about 2 seperate things, the weight exercises are far more geared to explosive than old school resistance exercises like chins/press ups (weight training via bodyweight). They use near to 90% of the muscles in the body and have the highest power/second rating of any exercise.

    The movements of these exercises themselves almost mimick punches, ie the leg split under a jerk is very similar to sitting down explosively on a punch

    I don't know the specifics of Jones weight programe, I don't know if he even married the 2 at all, all I know is his weight cutting was done all wrong so I doubt he had too many specialists aiding his bulking.

    What I do know is he mastered the right exercises and improved in them he would have been more explosive. You state Jones couldn't have been quicker at 168, your wrong he could have been. Mayweather could be much faster/explosive today with the right conditioner/nutritionist working with him and his families lack of understanding of this science is why I suspect they are accusing Pacquaio
     
  11. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,529
    76
    May 3, 2006
    Modern training methods may improve athleticism, but athleticism is just one aspect of boxing. Old school fighters were, generally, more skilled. And tougher. But not as athletic per se. Why do so many modern top boxers have trouble making weight, or, when they're HWs, not able to get in shape?
     
  12. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    As is my own. I'm currently using a whey/dextrose/maltodextrine/creatine monohydrate PWO solution with a daily multi and it's been pretty effective considering how little ive been able to work out during this semester. Recovery is one of the best things about supplements. A lot easier to just drink your macros instead of eating a ton of meals/day.
     
  13. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Haye won't do any roadwork, maximising VO2 via roadwork is paramount to boxing conditioning. Thats why Haye fades after 1-2 rounds. However he is very explosive from his weight training and has certainly maintained his speed. Haye focused on powerlifting movements rather than olympic lifts (ironically Olympic lifts generate much more power than 'power lifts'), which would have made him quicker.
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,138
    13,093
    Jan 4, 2008
    Yeah. When I get the late evening munchies I just mix some Whey with water and drink it. It's supposed to be at its most effective when you sleep.
     
  15. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Everything i've read actually says that stuff is really best for drinking during active hours, from my experience. Most people recommend casein(milk protein) for pre-sleep and late night eating because it stays in your stomach and helps stops catabolism at night. Whey isolate/concentrate is optimized for quick, rapid absorption of protein without all the other stuff you get out of say, a piece of meat. That's why it's the premier component of any PWO solution, it gets into your system ASAP with the right mix of carbs.

    That explains a lot, it's actually really hurting his game. Sprints and HIIT can be really useful for gaining VO2 but obviously steady state roadwork is tops in this category. He hasn't looked that explosive per se recently though, i'd blame that on inactivity more than anything