Where do you guys rate the Klits?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Oct 21, 2010.


  1. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    To me, they rank in top 20s.
    I can't rank either in the top 10.. yet.
     
  2. MaliBua

    MaliBua Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,869
    348
    Jun 20, 2010
    Funky Robots can not be ranked.

    I have them in Robot for Robot rankings 1,2 places.
     
  3. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    V.K. # 7

    W.K. # 13

    :deal

    MR.BILL:hat

    I have "Holy & Tyson" in at #'s 8 and 9 with "Liston and Frazier" tying for 10th place... I think Holy and Liston would pose tough fights for V.K. due to their style and good boxing skills, but V.K. would eat Tyson and Frazier alive...
    :good:scaredas:
     
  4. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Oh... And none of this horse**** that Jimmy Young would beat the K-brothers in a time machine... That's total bollocks... Young would be reduced to a human punching bag by either brother by round 6...
    :yep:hi:

    MR.BILL:rasta
     
  5. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    i got VK over Frazier and Tyson H2H as well.
     
  6. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    Top 100 for sure
     
  7. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    everyone in Bert Sugar's 100 Greatests are above the Klitschko's, for now
     
  8. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008

    Burt Sugar's list of ATG heavies has raised several eyebrows in the past...:admin

    I'm sorry, but while dude's like "Charles and Tunney" were great all around boxers, they would not do well with many of the post 1960 heavies in a time machine...

    MR.BILL:hat
     
  9. flyboi

    flyboi Member Full Member

    446
    0
    Dec 12, 2009
    Wlad i would say could be 10 but vitali not in the top 20. i dont understand why people match them up like they are the same talent. Wlad will destroy Vitali, only thing you cant account for is the psych aspect of him being the little brother not being able to beat the bigger brother.
     
  10. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    Vitali beats the **** out of Wlad. Can you imagine how terrified Wlad would be? Watch him against the likes of Chagaev!
     
  11. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    255
    Feb 5, 2005
    Depends if it's on a H2h or a career basis. H2H I'll put them both near the top 10.

    Careerwise, I'd put V.K. in the top 20 range and W.K. in the 15-20 range.
     
  12. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    thats fine, you can believe that. on the other hand, Bert Randolph Sugar tends to be one of the most relevant sources out there. that alone should make a fair arguement.
     
  13. Leonit

    Leonit Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,331
    4
    Jan 6, 2009
    when you make an ATG list the only thing that matter are accomplishments like number of title defenses, wins against HOF and other ATG. Klit brothers don't have any wins against other HOF or ATG for the time being. Vitaly fought one and lost. They have long title runs so they should make it to the HOF one day. If I should rate them ATG for the HW division they should be between 15 and 20. P4P they will never make the top 100 for obvious reasons
     
  14. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,310
    29,487
    Apr 4, 2005
    I have both just outside my top 10. It's hard to rank them any higher as nether have been undisputed champion. Maybe Wlad can crack my top 10 one day if he can unify all the titles once Vitali retires.
     
  15. WiDDoW_MaKeR

    WiDDoW_MaKeR ESB Hall of Fame Member Full Member

    37,427
    89
    Jul 19, 2004
    No need to rate them at this time. We can wait until they retire.