Klits. haters are getting one step ahead now

I found it to be a complete mismatch of epic proportions. I forgot about it quickly after, only to then read Vitali's ardent support trying to talk up the win like it meant anything.

I trust and hope that Haye won't drag his mismatch out for 12 rounds.

 

To win without risk is to triumph without glory....

 

well then, i found this thread especially for you:
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?p=7727251#post7727251

 

Indeed. I was on point.

None of them are fighting great opposition.

 

there the same as mayweather haters, they just want them to engage further to get kod

 

looks like you overlook my post on the second page but i don't really give a ****

 

Begs the question why you bothered to post the link in the first place, Who'sNext.

I'll address your points if you copy and paste them in this thread.

 

only boring to people who want to see them lose. people who like a good fight admire and appreciate the skills, courage and bravado of the Klitschkos who are the best at what they do. Hands down.

 

Tony Thompson? Hasmin Rahman? Ibragimov? Samuel Peter? Eddie Chambers? These aren't good fights, Sammy.

 

Wladimir has improved by leaps and bounds.

 

TWO DIFFERENT CONTRACTS.

The original contract Haye SIGNED, had options like Chisora's. He agreed to those and signed.

The contract Haye DECLINED was the 50/50, no options offer.

 

I have been saying this from the beginning -

biased posters like Boxing Girl who have not been privy to the terms of the deal just don't understand it.

 

In the public domain but not true.

 

So you are saying that the 50/50 no options deal that was offered, was not in fact "no options". Is that that what you are saying?

Even Haye didn't dispute the "no options", he only disputed the UK money.

 

too bad loud mouth ***** haye is scared of the boring brothers...could have been exciting to watch them shutting his mouth...:hey:hey:hey