Whos is better? Ottkes 21 defences or Hopkins 20 defences?

Even though you already waved good bye as a form of retreat, saving yourself from further mental stress from the heavy pwnage barrocade I inflict. Just to remind you the advice you wish you had taken before:-

Just so you get the correct interpretation of that golden advice given by a neutral spectator, I broken it down into bitesize for you to easily digest it.

Sorry was used here because of the sympathy some people feel for my victims after I ruthlessly destroy them. Even though you did nothing wrong to that neutral spectator. Another interpretation was that knowing you would be stubborn in accepting defeat it was said to ease the pain.

The neutral spectator had never seen a pwnage handed out like that:deal

That was sincere advice given to you by the neutral spectator for your own good, to save you from a severe beating and mental stress developing within your brain cells. But you refused to accept it and then were left retreating like a ***** as follows:-

 

Ive only browsed through that quote because once again it is incredibly lame again .
I notice you are copying me once more when I said you made a '***** move' by not answering my questions atsch.
You pwned yourself all along by bumping my thread like a good kid, trying to say Ottke was heavier than alot of his opponents by stating his weight when he turned pro, forgetting/not knowing he was 30 when he turned pro, and said Tito and Oscar were kids when they turned pro and at 27 were natural MWs .
Then you wouldnt answer the questions I posed atsch. Pwned supremely.
The reason I didnt read your post properly is because I said, lets keep them shorter and work on individual points, but you couldnt even do that atsch.
Now do yourself a favour, and take my advice and try and get a girlfriend :hi:.
Now bump my thread *****

 

****ing Hell

 

whats up dip****?

 

So Headgiver, still hasn't found your balls.....gutless *****..:yep

 

you know all about the 1000 vcash qualification criteria before you can debate with an elite esb titan atsch

let me just check . . . . . . . . . . . . :think

dhralf = zero vcash

0 vcash = a poster of the highest, narrow minded ignorance, incapable of debate with elite posters. a poster with zero vcash is usually obsessed with tranny porn and belongs in the esb sewers amongst the rats, crawling through huge chunks of sloppy excrement :rofl

 

off the rails

 

Gotcha!....:yep

:hi: Gutless *****!

 

Yep, if Headgiver is in a thread, you know its going off the rails, like the *** Anglosaxon failtrain.

:yep

 

Roof Beam, Rope, Stool - Figure out the rest!

 

prime Ottke would beat any version of Bhop..





..in germany

 

Yet this sorry piece of **** says he isnt bias!:verysad

 

Presenting facts cant be bias. They are facts atsch

 

Its your opinion you dumb****!atsch