Whos is better? Ottkes 21 defences or Hopkins 20 defences?

Pwned yourself.
What difference does not leaving Germany have to do with anything :huh. Hopkins didnt defend out of America :dead.

Ottke did unify the WBA & IBF belts.

Pwned peepoe now as well

 

he did not unify all four belts, the way Hopkins did.

He also fought lesser competition.

Just keep shooting yourself in the foot, it's funny how deeply some fanboys follow a fighter... you're like a *******, only worse!

 

Yes, the feather-fisted gift receiver would certainly agree!

 

You are too ****ing stupid to even realize it!

So what is that you stupid ass boy??? Is that not your opinion or not?atsch

 

Who the **** is Sven Ottke???

 

Bailey give it up already, you and your ****ing british euro trash hype machine has gone tooo too far, to even say that ottke's defenses or reign etc better then b-hops one of the top 5/6 middleweights of all times.

GTFO

 

A European guy that the piece of **** Baily is trying to big up! He so keen on belittling Americans and turn around and big up an overhyped fighter like Sven.:-(

****ing pathetic I tell you!:verysad

 

Read below, or decide that ignorance is bliss. How can you say Ottke fought lesser competition?:nut He was fighting guys his natural size who went on to have success atsch

Now do you think that Oscar would have beaten Eastman or Echoles at MW? I dont

 

You havent even found a decent answer atsch ****wit

atsch Ottke is German you muppet

Whats pathetic is that you cant debate boxing and fear the questions that I present you.
What im doing here is appreciating a fighter that wasnt recognised for his great work.
I could be sucked into your vile ways of hate breeding hate, but im beyond it, you foul scumbag :dead

You see. Ottke beat all these world class fighter around his own weight who went on to achieve at this weight or higher after losing to Ottke.:deal
Pwned you all again .
Now lets see if any of you can debate sensibly :hi:

 

the ignorance in this hbo / ring comic puppett is particularly sickenning :dead:dead:dead:dead:dead

the narrow minded ignorance is clearly backed up by his repulsive vcash total of 75 that clearly illustrates a disgracefull knowledge of boxing that leaves him pwned repeatedly day in day out :dead:dead:dead:dead:dead

 

**** your stats, Hopkins will always be miles above your gift-receiver.

The one who lives in ignorance is you and those who \think like you.

Stop following boxing you biased joke of a "fan."

 

So now that you cant debate, because you have been wned by facts :deal, you turn to calling me bias atsch, when I dont care which one is better than the other, but just viewed the stats, which as you obviously dont disagree favour Ottke .

To think I have produced legit facts that you cant debate against, and you say Im bias .

Heehoo, broken down, Pwned and destroyed by the facts :vonnecunt

You can come again Heehoo, but for now, will have to except you have been wned by the ESB champ

artyartyarty

 

**** all of this talking, you're repeating the same old tired arguement...Whats the point of answering your dumbass questions when I've answered them already??.

If you want to know my anwers, go back and read them throught this shitty thread of yours...Dont get mad because nobody is following your opinion...You expect people to place Sven above Hopkins(title reign wise) when Sven has had several questionable decision alone...That there should give the edge to Hopkins alone...If it wasnt for those gift decision, Sven could have very well lost his title...So that kills your **** arguement but as usual, your bitchass always try to belittle the American to praise the shabby European fighter...You're so ****ing predictable.

Call me whatever the **** you wont but you know damn well Sven title reign is overrated...No matter how you try to keep on repeating the same old **** is not gonna change what happened in the past...Sven has had several questionable decision and thats a fact that you've yet to dispute.

****ing dumbass!

 

Why havent you made a bet yet??? Its easy to sit on the sideline like a ***** and make these type of comments...I guys Bailey is a disgrace as well since he's lost bets??? (according to your shitty logical approach)

****ing *****!:rofl

 

So tell me then, besides the Reid fight, what Ottke decisions do you call debateable, but more amusingly what fights of Ottkes have you really watched . I doubt many, if any, from your lack of knowledge .
Still you say Ottke could have lost his title but fail to acknowledge that Hopkins DID lose his title and COULDNT win it back atsch, also you forget to mention that one of Hopkins defences was a NC, due to Hopkins shameful ring dive.

Rudyard has been broken, destroyed and wned again