the answer to that will have to wait till they finish off their careers. one thing for sure is that i will have been wrong about one or both of them.
This content is protected Just be grateful that Shane is an honorary Mexican. You can apply the same for emmanuel after Nov 13th.
I know you're a Pacquiao fan, and I know you're greasing the skids for another amplification of Pacquiao's legacy. I'm sorry to inform you that this fight is indeed to showcase Pacquiao's speed and talent against a punching bag.
I actually thought Clottey stood a better chance than Margo does. Clottey at least used to like to fight some of the time.
His size and strength is a smoke-screen, pacquiao can spar with some big dudes and he can fight big dudes, thats all there is to it Margarito got knocked out by Mosley cause Mosley is a great fighter. Margarito will lose most definitely by UD or late stoppage because Margarito has to take 5 punches before he can land. Sure he is gonna land on Pacquiao, but at what cost and how much power does Margarito really have? 1 fight in almost 2 years and didn't even take the guy out? will be a good night of boxing whatever the outcome
boxing fan sinse childhood in late 70s so dont confuse me with a *******. its amusing to read that you think my fondness for paquiao automaticaly disqualifies me from sound reasoning. i know what that punching bag can do. his fights are readily available to anyone wishing to watch them. ive also watched many fighters in the last three decades make their climbs up the weight ladder. only difference with pac is that he started at a lower rung. this could very well have been put together to give pac some shine. that doesnt change the reasoning behind my beliefs.
So when Pac decimates Marg, like I have been saying, you're going to admit it was Pac being superior in almost every category? You're not going to pretend like Pac beat a super amazing challenger?
i think ive already stated as much in this very thread. i know you are used to dealing with a bunch of little men on here who write something then contradict themselves in the next post. only to deny ever having stated anything in the first place. i know what "floored" means. i defy anyone to find proof in my 2000 posts of me talking out both sides of my face. i know who i am and what i believe 24/7 and 365.
Williams, Cintron, Cotto, and Mosley, all are big punchers. The difference? The gameplan mi amigo. Mosley tied up Margarito like no tomorrow therefore neutralizing Margarito's limited offense on the inside. Margarito is known to take some to give some. Well, with Mosley Sugar Shane gave him some and tied up Margo before Margo could give some back. I also think Mosley was double fisted fighter dangerous with both hands, unlike Williams and Cintron. Cotto also a very good puncher, but not a one bomb at a time type like Cintron or Mosley were doing it vs. Margarito. Pacman for some reason as small as he is didn't look too small vs Cotto. He still has those feet that help him move around like a lightweight.
So being vague and lending credibility to Margo makes you different from the average pacquiao supporter how?
man did Uncle Bob say that in an interview somewhere? margarito is a disgraced fighter who almost went into the ring with lethal weapons against Sugar Shane Mosley, he has fought once in almost 2 years and nobody knows if he has any real power (maybe shoulda knocked that last guy out, maybe we would be somewhat intrigued) now ask yourself, who is pacquiao and what has he been doing for the last 2 years
point to where i am vague and i will clarify for you. so rather than adress my post you are going to ask irrelavent questions?