Should vitali and wlad both be in the top 10 p4p?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RightCross, Oct 26, 2010.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,336
    21,796
    Sep 15, 2009
    wlad definitely. his longevity has earned it. plus he has defeated some top names since in his run. undefeated boxers such as peter, chagaev and ibragimov. plus top ranked fighters such as byrd and chambers. definitely earned it.

    vitali. well im sorry but victories over fat peter, gomev, arreola, johnson, sosnowski and briggs dont cut it. he is dominant yes, but his opponents are ****.

    and any arguments about people not fighting him is irrelevant, it dont constitute a ranking. same way liston wasnt considered champ until he finally got his shot at patterson.
     
  2. Kel1981

    Kel1981 P4P No.1 Full Member

    9,561
    9
    Oct 19, 2008
    So the people who think they should........who do you drop from the top 10?
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,336
    21,796
    Sep 15, 2009
    hmmm what is my top 10 these days.

    pac
    floyd
    martinez
    williams
    lopez
    montiel
    pongsaklek
    pascal
    wlad
    jmm

    now i put jmm at 10 because he does deserve a top 10 position based on his accomplishments. but i feel he is finished at the top now and will lose his upcoming fight.
     
  4. HEADBANGER

    HEADBANGER TEAM ELITE GENERAL Full Member

    13,630
    655
    Oct 17, 2009
    no lets fill the top 10 with hypejob americans who have achieved **** all in the game.
     
  5. Peter Brit

    Peter Brit Member Full Member

    468
    0
    Jun 4, 2010
    Well Vitial gave an unmotivated Lennox a good fight. Then again Lennox lost when he was unmotivated so hard to judge. I do think Vitial would have given Lennox a decent fight no matter when they met.

    Holyfield I believe in any era before the 90's and the birth of the super heavy would have been up their with the best. I would put him behind Ali, Louis and Holmes, on a par with Foreman, Tyson, Dempsey.

    Ahead of Liston, Patterson, the big Finn, Burger, Lyle, Norton, Shavers, Witherspoon, Bruno, Abi Simmon, Sharkey, Baer, (might struggle with Turney skills), Rocky

    Now Bowe and Lennox beat Holyfield and i think Vitial does too. Wladimir may have better skills but I think his chin lets him down. Also Vitial is a natural fighter, Wladimir has learnt to fight. Against the best I think Wladimir gets caught sooner or later. Not sure if the size advantage would be to much for Holyfield.

    Most fighters prior to Ali could make the old 190 crusier limit (ring weight 195).
    The 70's fighters would make the new cruiser limit 200 (ring weight 210+ with the day before weighin). Hell a young Tyson might have been able to make a guest appearance.

    Good natural super heavies 235+ and not fat, I think there is only Lennox, Bowe and the two brothers. All the other big guys the grants of this world etc tend to be big rather than skilled. I think we have got to the point where there are enough super heavies to generate a few greats. A great 235 fighter beats a great 205 fighter.

    Heavyweight skills have declined so it is very hard to gauge a lewis against a peak holmes or a joe louis.
     
  6. tito44

    tito44 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,585
    6
    Oct 25, 2009
    Wlad, should be in the top 5.
     
  7. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    Not for me. They are dominating a very weak division. is jabbing Rahman, Briggs, Peter into submission is not p4p material.
     
  8. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,846
    2,140
    Jul 19, 2004
    I say neither should be considered very highly p4p. They are both excellent heavyweights, but for a big man to be p4p, they need to be extremely skilled. Their size advantage plays an enormous part in their success, their skill set is based upon having a size advantage (wlad more so than vitali)...and that is the exact opposite of what p4p is. P4p is about factoring out the size advantage.
     
  9. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    If they beat Haye and beat each other then ONLY ONE have a case to be on the P4P.
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,336
    21,796
    Sep 15, 2009
    that is combining the two. treat them as seperate
     
  11. Casamayor122

    Casamayor122 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,102
    6
    Oct 17, 2009
    Looking at the poor state of the p4p list, hell yeah...
     
  12. BoxingFan2010

    BoxingFan2010 Boxing Addict banned

    6,055
    1
    Jul 10, 2010
    Both will make it in time.


    Peace
     
  13. Kid Presentable

    Kid Presentable Facial Blocking Full Member

    2,818
    1
    Sep 14, 2008
    pound for pound supposed to mean if height and size are taken out of account. p4p unfortuntely wouldnt put them in top twenty. you imagime if mayweather, pac even likes of mosely would do to them guys if they were the same height?
     
  14. rushman

    rushman Devoid is Devoid Full Member

    7,308
    1
    Jul 24, 2004
    People are making a mistake.

    The purpose of the P4P ranking is that a fighter shouldn't be disadvantaged by their size. In other words, you can't be penalised for being too small or too big.

    A strawweight may have extraordinary skill but not much power - that is due to their size. With P4P rankings this is taken into account. Someone like Wlad is as much hampered by his size as aided by it - however his skill makes him very effective.

    Expecting a heavyweight to be able to move and throw combos like a welterweight is as ridiculous as asking the welterweight to punch as hard or to have the same punch resistance as a heavyweight.

    Wlad should be quite firmly in the top ten. Vitali should be between around 15.
     
  15. Boxing in montr

    Boxing in montr Mandatory challenger Full Member

    2,456
    0
    May 21, 2008
    Definitively top10 p4p for both brothers. Not their fault that there's not any valuable heavyweight opponent for them.