DISTRACTIONS are always are a part of a boxer's life

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by AxlRose, Oct 30, 2010.


  1. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    I dunno about ESB I wasnt here then you idiot. And I doubt 95% of ESB didnt have much boxing knowledge like you. At any rate, most of those who cried mismatch were *****S who didnt want Pac to proceed with that fight and idiots who thought Pac didnt know **** and DLH was prime. Then there is the exception -- you -- FILIPINOs who just do as they are told and dont think for themselves, doubting any and all things Filipino, and parroting all the things their foreign counterparts say. :lol:
     
  2. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    That's part of the reason I said he'd win idiot. Did you google who Nard was, you noob. :lol:

    There you go again accusing Pac fans of another vice -- this time homosexuality. LOL is your name Roger Mayweather Sr? :rofl
     
  3. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Please.... make a thread about this, and see how ****ing ******ed your claim is. It's no secret the boxing community thought that fight was (wrongly) a freak show. I only remember Pacd and some Tszyu fan on this board who really believed in this fight. And I give them credit for that. And like I said you weren't here posting about it you can't rub **** in my face:deal And as for calling it correctly, you're clearly making stuff up, just as you have many times in this thread, so **** OFF. You're not PACD.:deal
     
  4. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Yes.... pick Pac to beat Nard because the fight won't even happen. Feel better now? Now go give yourself a pat on the back.:lol::lol::lol:
     
  5. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    LOL. Do you really think ESB is the only boxing site in the internet? You're even dumber than I thought! :lol:

    So which Pacdoubter are you, the hardcore ***** or the self-hating Filipino?

    Obviously, you immediately pooh-poohed the win by agreeing with the post-fight ***** excuse that ANYBODY COULDVE BEATEN OSCAR THAT NIGHT. :roll:
     
  6. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    I pick Nard on four things, not in any way related to that you accuse me of.

    First, Pac hits like a MW.

    Second, Pac will be the fastest fighter Nard would ever have fought.

    Third, Nard has lost some.

    Fourth, Pac has beaten DLH more convincingly than Nard did.

    Of course I dont expect you to understand any of this ****, you think ESB is the only boxing site in the internet. :lol:
     
  7. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Ok, name me a boxing board where majority of the members thought that Pac was going to win. Pacland not included for obvious reasons. So please, go ahead, post the links.

    Another lame-ass assumption, one which I don't even remember making:lol: Chalk that up to another one of your lies.

    I could be wrong but you would find yourself disagreeing with majority of the board thinking that was a fit Oscar in the ring that night. Even Roach said pounce on him because the I.V. marks were fresh. But let's not get too much into that, lest you call me a hardcore ***** again:nut
     
  8. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Oooookayyyy....:lol:
     
  9. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    I think it was at least 70-30, 30 for Pac in DHB. But that's beside the point, because a lot of doubters were haters and fans who didnt know any better.

    Re IV marks, those dont mean ****, Pac wouldve still beat a prime Oscar. Wait, do you have prime Oscar beating Pac too? :roll:
     
  10. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    When I say Nard, I mean Bernard Hopkins, you boxing noob. :lol:
     
  11. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    It was Pac 70-30 in Doghouse STICKING FOR HIM because they thought Oscar was a piece of **** trying to take advantage of little Pac!!! Not 70-30 because they thought Pac would beat him!!!:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  12. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Didn't I just post these?

    Which Nard did you think I was talking about??:?
     
  13. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    Jeebus lemme get this through your thick skull. A LOT OF FANS THOUGHT PAC WOULD WIN. A LOT OF FILIPINOS THOUGHT PAC WOULD WIN.

    You on the on the other hand, had to wait for what foreign boxing fans had to say before venturing your opinion. You said this because you had no confidence in yourself -- cant blame you -- and even lower confidence for Pacquiao. Which is inexcusable because by then, you shouldve known what Pac was capable of, and that DLH had lost multiple times while promoting boxing.

    At any rate, think about it. DLH had a hard time with elite fighters, I cant even think of a fight with an elite fighter he even won. And everyone thought he lost to Sturm, journeyman, way before the Pac fight.

    But I guess these **** never occured to you, huh? :hi:
     
  14. AxlRose

    AxlRose Guest

    You just googled who "Nard" is, admit it. It came up with light-heavy so you posted "light-heavy". Seriously, what Nard fights have you watched?:hi:
     
  15. Marc

    Marc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,971
    0
    Apr 7, 2007
    Another lameass assumption. **** you:lol: Claim that you called the DLH fight correctly again dickwad:rofl