:rofl Hypocrite much? You constantly critcise Froch for talking and trying to hype fights, but when Rios does it - it's OK. I sense hatred :-(
Froch says stupid **** and is a poor boxer yet thinks he's great. He has nothing but excuses after every poor performance.
He has beaten the current light heavyweight champion of the world, the former middleweight champion of the world, and the second best American super-middleweight in the world. He has a right to talk big. But if you disagree with that, how can you say Rios has a right to talk ****? He has beaten Anthony Peterson for ****s sake atsch. Froch has the better resume, is a former champion who has defeated quality opposition, and will fight any opponent out there. Rios has no right to go round calling anyone a *****, never mind the P4P number 1. You can't criticise Froch, without criticising Rios.
Pascal was weight drained, and Pascal is not that good. Dawson threw away their fight and if Dawson and Froch ever fought he'd get destroyed. And I suspect if Froch and Pascal fought again Pascal schools him easy. Meaningless. Besides losing 2 straight to Pavlik, taylor also won questionable decisions against Winky Wright and Cory Spinks, welterweights. But even then the fact is Froch needed a lucky KO to beat a smaller man. Which says alot about Froch since Taylor was never that good even when he was a middleweight. Abraham completely dismantled and destroyed him. Something Froch didnt come close to doing. Dirrell won that fight easily. Got robbed because it was in **** town England. Froch barely landed 5 punches in the entire fight. Dirrell hurt him in the 10th and completely outclassed him in the 11th and 12. And Dirrell never had went 12 rounds before that fight. Then he loses to a blind fighter in Kessler. He talks bigger then he is. Take away the Dirrell robbery and he has 1 big victory in his career. Rios actually has style and looks good in the ring. Froch is going to be brutally destroyed in his next fight or not to soon after. He's been hurt in his last 3 fights because of his shitty D. Rios looks like the real deal. Froch never was. Just a very lucky fighter.
Damm, can you guys picture what Juan Diaz-Brandon Rios would look like? They will set punch stats record.
The reason MW doesn't like Froch is because he's white than white, and fights nothing like Floyd Mayweather...everything else is bull**** filler.
I like Rios I think he's an exciting fighter with a big personality. We need more guys with the personality of Rios in boxing.:deal
This. Give the kid repect. He backs his talk up. Hell, not once did he complain about the low blows, instead he chose to fight like a tough sob he is. **** you guys!
Regardless, Froch HAS beaten the current light heavyweight champion of the world. He HAS beaten the former middleweight champion of the world, and he HAS beaten the second best American super middleweight. Regardless of your opinion on those fights, and opinion on those fighters (which all lack evidence), the facts present themselves. Froch has beaten world-class opposition, he has a right to talk trash and criticise. Rios has not beaten world class opposition. If you criticise Froch for talking crap, although he has beaten World class opposition, but condone Rios's talking crap, then that makes you a hypocrite and a hater. How do you expect people to take you seriously when you act like that? Froch can talk all the bull**** he wants, because he has the wins on his record to back it up. Rios doesn't. As I said, you can't crticise one without the other.
He doesn't like Froch because Froch beat Dirrell. He butthurt. Quite dissapointinng when a so called 'fan' of boxing acts this way. Disgraceful.
Again you misunderstand. I have no problem with trash talking. I have problem with hypocrisy. Such as "Never fight in Europe because you'll get robbed" when he was the benefit of a gift against Dirrell. Rios is just bad ass. Froch is goofy.