Did you figure out in which fight Johnson quit yet? I'll give you a hint, I am not referring to the Jim Johnson fight.:hi:
THis is truly the classic match up of the classic forum ... two evenly matched maniacs ... nasty at times but both backed up by true knowledge of the sport .... both Board heavyweights ! :vonnecunt
Don't sell me short. I am nasty all the time,unfortunately, I am also a heavyweight, though I boxed at Welter and Middle.
The last time I was a middle I was in 9th grade. So you're a heavy now eh? Good me too. You would not last as long as Spinks did when he meet Tyson. That much I could guarantee.
Oh my word, a challenge from the colonies! Somebody puts a post up poking gentle fun at us, and the fact that we do not like each other ,and you start beating your chest from the safety of the other side of the Atlantic. Shades of Jim Corbett, when Peter Jackson was safely back in Australia! Your weight is immaterial, because. A. You never boxed competitively. B. A large part of it is made up by your head. RAINMAN. You can guarantee nothing, except that there will be at least one spelling mistake in any post you scrawl. Run along ,and let the men talk ,you bombastic windbag.
Next April I have been invited to England. My wife is friends with a USA government employee who administers the houses in the embassy. Pick a ring, and we'll see if I'm bluffing. We know you won't. :hi:
I referred to BOTH of you as heavyweights in regard to your knowledge of the sport despite my differences of opinion many times over. This is in contrast to flyweights like Goosepimple and Princess for example.
I KNOW I WILL! Let me know when you are landing , we can do it at HEATHROW ,WHY WAIT? I've had nearly as many fights in the street, as in the ring. Can't you make it sooner? HOW ABOUT A WAGER ,SAY £100? We will see who is the April Fool?
I was flattered by your reference ,and amused by the context. Some one missed the point ,and it was not me.atsch