Who's the technically better boxer Pacquiao or Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Shane, Apr 14, 2008.

  1. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    19,549
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is only one way to settle this. A fight between the two. HA
    I actually remember a thread started for this. It was hilarious how people were saying Pac would test Cottos chin. Oh man was that good.
     
  2. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    9,268
    Likes Received:
    0
    saul,

    He's just teasing pac haters. He ain't serious... don't take all things seriously. :good
     
  3. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2004
    Messages:
    19,338
    Likes Received:
    1
    WHAT??? Cotto is the better technical boxer. But PAC has more natural ability and talent.
     
  4. stevebhoy87

    stevebhoy87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,304
    Likes Received:
    6
    Pretty much the way i look at it, cotto is the better fighter but pac has a better resume so has to rank slighlty higher on my p4p list
     
  5. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    65,862
    Likes Received:
    16
    delete.
     
  6. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    6
    Cotto & the distance is growing
     
  7. ethandelahoya

    ethandelahoya p4p no#1 Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2008
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    0
    all around boxer - cotto

    does pac even have a defence the fights i have seen him in his hands are allways low when hes thorwing puches, when he jabs his right hand is allways near his waist only time i see pac with his hand high are when he is looking for angle and moveing his head :think
     
  8. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    29,944
    Likes Received:
    8,606
    Cotto. In terms of versatility, defensive ability, and punching technique, he's superior to Pac. In terms of natural abilty and resume, Pac gets the nod.
     
  9. RealIzm

    RealIzm Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2007
    Messages:
    12,032
    Likes Received:
    2
    Cotto
     
  10. Haye

    Haye Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    4,928
    Likes Received:
    2
    Why is this even a question?

    Cotto, by far. Pacs 'technical' skills are non existant. He is great at what he does, which is come forward throwing fast, hard and accurate punches. He relies upon physical talent, not textbook skills.
     
  11. Marcelo

    Marcelo Guest

    bump time!!!:lol:
     
  12. Marcelo

    Marcelo Guest

    another nostradamus!! tsamba!!!
     
  13. LukeO

    LukeO Erik Morales is God Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2007
    Messages:
    37,866
    Likes Received:
    45
    Cotto still.
     
  14. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    Messages:
    60,376
    Likes Received:
    242
    I still say Cotto is the better technical fighter.
    (Regardless of the result of their H2H)
     
  15. Marcelo

    Marcelo Guest

    r u fkin blind?:bbb