Jake LaMotta vs. Sugar Ray...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by thunder06, Jul 30, 2007.


  1. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    there's a world of different between butterfuly and robinson, one of the greatest punchers ever though

    leonard was not a "puncher" per se but at welter he had serious pop. he was a boxer puncher who could deal real damage when he sat down on his shots

    whether he could even dent lamotta though is a different story...
     
  2. yes, i said butterfly because his hitting power was it compared with the robinson´s



    [/quote]
    leonard was an stylist, he knocked out his rivals with fast combination by accumulation of blows and weariness
     
  3. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    77
    Jan 21, 2006
    This. Lamotta had the style, but not anywhere near the power. Duran had a lot more sting. You can't wear an elite cutie like Leonard down with tenacity and pressure alone. You need to hurt him and break him down. I really don't feel LaMotta could be counted on to do that a majority of the time.

    Leonard by UD 6 or 7 times out of ten. He loses one time because he stands toe to toe to much and gets edged, and the other 2 or 3 times because LaMotta does great work and breaks him down effectively. Jake will not come close to kayoing Leonard.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,967
    12,808
    Jan 4, 2008
    It's a stupid expression. Robinson hit harder, but Leonard had a fine punch. It wasn't a joke compared to anyone his size. And no, I didn't pick Leonard by KO.